Hi Sandeep,

On 2023/8/31 07:16, Sandeep Dhavale wrote:
As erofs-utils supports different block sizes upto
EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE, relax the checks so same tools
can be used to create images for platforms where
page size can be greater than 4096.

Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <[email protected]>
---
  lib/namei.c | 2 --
  mkfs/main.c | 9 +++++----
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/namei.c b/lib/namei.c
index 2bb1d4c..45dbcd3 100644
--- a/lib/namei.c
+++ b/lib/namei.c
@@ -144,8 +144,6 @@ int erofs_read_inode_from_disk(struct erofs_inode *vi)
                vi->u.chunkbits = sbi->blkszbits +
                        (vi->u.chunkformat & EROFS_CHUNK_FORMAT_BLKBITS_MASK);
        } else if (erofs_inode_is_data_compressed(vi->datalayout)) {
-               if (erofs_blksiz(vi->sbi) != EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE)
-                       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
                return z_erofs_fill_inode(vi);
        }
        return 0;
diff --git a/mkfs/main.c b/mkfs/main.c
index c03a7a8..37bf658 100644
--- a/mkfs/main.c
+++ b/mkfs/main.c
@@ -550,10 +550,11 @@ static int mkfs_parse_options_cfg(int argc, char *argv[])
                cfg.c_dbg_lvl = EROFS_ERR;
                cfg.c_showprogress = false;
        }
-       if (cfg.c_compr_alg[0] && erofs_blksiz(&sbi) != EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE) {
-               erofs_err("compression is unsupported for now with block size 
%u",
-                         erofs_blksiz(&sbi));
-               return -EINVAL;
+       if (cfg.c_compr_alg[0] && erofs_blksiz(&sbi) != getpagesize()) {
+               erofs_warn("subpage blocksize with compression is not yet "
+                       "supported. Compressed image will only work with "
+                       "arch pagesize = blocksize = %u bytes",
+                       erofs_blksiz(&sbi));
        }

Thanks for the patches.

I'm fine to relax  EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE check, yet could we
add a check as erofs_blksiz <= EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE somewhere?

Otherwise, we could suffer from stack overflow
(if EROFS_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE is outdated or somewhat small...)

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Reply via email to