On 2025/7/14 11:15, Gao Xiang wrote:
..
if (!name)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -411,9 +416,12 @@ int erofs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, int
index, const char *name,
if (it.name.len > EROFS_NAME_LEN)
return -ERANGE;
+ if (erofs_sb_has_xattr_compr(sbi))
Is xattr_compr another feature under meta compr? In my opinion, how
about splitting it with another patch?
Just answer this in advance, it should be in this patch, or
as a seperate patch before this patch.
Otherwise it's non-bisectable (and thus causes a incompat
feature) because users could use a kernel with metadata
compression but without erofs_sb_has_xattr_compr, it
causes the connected features fragmented.
Ok,got it!
Thanks,
Hongbo
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Thanks,
Hongbo
