On Wed, Jan 14, 2026 at 06:28:34PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 2026/1/12 22:40, Gao Xiang wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > On 2026/1/12 17:14, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 10:28:46AM +0000, Hongbo Li wrote: > > > > Enabling page cahe sharing in container scenarios has become > > > > increasingly > > > > crucial, as it can significantly reduce memory usage. In previous > > > > efforts, > > > > Hongzhen has done substantial work to push this feature into the EROFS > > > > mainline. Due to other commitments, he hasn't been able to continue his > > > > work recently, and I'm very pleased to build upon his work and continue > > > > to refine this implementation. > > > > > > I can't vouch for implementation details but I like the idea so +1 from > > > me. > > > > Thanks, I think it should be fine. > > Let me finalize the review this week. > > I wonder if it's possible that you could merge v14 > PATCH 1 and 2 now to the vfs-iomap branch (both > patches are reviewed or acked): > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected] > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/[email protected] > > since these two patches are almost independent to the > main feature and can be merged independently as I said > in the previous cycle. > > Merging those patches into a vfs branch also avoids > other iomap conflicts.
Done. > > For the other patches (since PATCH 3), how about going > through erofs tree (I will merge your iomap branch), Fine. > since it seems at least it will cause several conflicts > with my other ongoing work, does it sound good to you? All good.
