On Wed, Feb 25 2026 at 12:09:07 am +08, Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote: >> With 64K, the memory footprint would be significantly larger. >> What do you think? > > I understand your concern although I think they are just > for temporary use, and 64k is still not too huge and > the userspace stack is less worried. > > Or how about just use max(PAGE_SIZE, 16k) instead for > aarch64? then you will get 16k for most of the time > unless PAGE_SIZE > 16k.
That seems a good solution, and I imagine we'd want to retain the existing configure switch. I'll work on a patch for submission. -- Matt
