On 2026/6/22 16:11, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
Combine i_nb.blocks_hi with i_u.blocks_lo when computing
inode->i_blocks for compressed inodes, mirroring the startblk_hi
handling for unencoded inodes a few lines above.  Also evaluate
the shift in u64 to avoid truncation.

Fixes: efb2aef569b3 ("erofs: add encoded extent on-disk definition")
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <[email protected]>
---
v2:
  - Fix the Fixes: tag to efb2aef569b3 ("erofs: add encoded extent
    on-disk definition"), the commit that introduced blocks_hi for
    compressed inodes (Gao Xiang)
  - Reorder to "blocks_lo | (blocks_hi << 32)" with explicit parentheses
    and shorter lines (Gao Xiang)

  fs/erofs/inode.c | 5 +++--
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/inode.c b/fs/erofs/inode.c
index a188c570087a..dc0e3d6bb2b1 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/inode.c
@@ -191,8 +191,9 @@ static int erofs_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
                err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
                goto err_out;
        } else {
-               inode->i_blocks = le32_to_cpu(copied.i_u.blocks_lo) <<
-                               (sb->s_blocksize_bits - 9);
+               inode->i_blocks = (le32_to_cpu(copied.i_u.blocks_lo) |
+                                  ((u64)le16_to_cpu(copied.i_nb.blocks_hi) << 32)) 
<<

I will change this line to
                        ((u64)le16_to_cpu(copied.i_nb.blocks_hi) << 32)) <<

to avoid overly long lines (since such alignment is not strictly necessary
but overly long lines should be avoided), otherwise it looks good to me,

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Reply via email to