On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 6:52 AM Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Currently the iomap buffered read path tries to build up read context
> (i.e. bios for the typical block based case) over multiple iomaps as
> long as the sector matches.  This does not take into account files
> that can map to multiple different devices.  While this could be fixed
> by a bdev check in iomap_bio_read_folio_range, the building up of I/O
> over iomaps actually was a problem for the not yet merged ext2 iomap
> port, as that does want to send out I/O at the end of an indirect
> block mapped range.
>
> So instead of adding more checks move over to a model where a bio only
> spans a single iomap.  Change ->submit_read to be called after each
> iteration, and pass a force argument to indicate that the bio must
> be submitted set on the last iteration.  Switch the bio based users
> to always submit, while keeping the single submit for fuse.
>
> Fixes: dfeab2e95a75 ("erofs: add multiple device support")
> Reported-by: Kelu Ye <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Yifan Zhao <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/exfat/iomap.c       |  4 ++--
>  fs/fuse/file.c         |  6 +++++-
>  fs/iomap/bio.c         | 11 +++++++----
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>  fs/ntfs/aops.c         |  4 ++--
>  fs/ntfs3/inode.c       |  4 ++--
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c      |  5 +++--
>  include/linux/iomap.h  |  5 +++--
>  8 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/bio.c b/fs/iomap/bio.c
> index 0f31e35567b4..f71aaaf60301 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/bio.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/bio.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ u32 iomap_finish_ioend_buffered_read(struct iomap_ioend 
> *ioend)
>  }
>
>  void iomap_bio_submit_read_endio(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> -               struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, bio_end_io_t end_io)
> +               struct iomap_read_folio_ctx *ctx, bool force,

nit: might simplify things to drop the unused force arg

> +               bio_end_io_t end_io)
>  {
>         struct bio *bio = ctx->read_ctx;
>
> @@ -87,13 +88,15 @@ void iomap_bio_submit_read_endio(const struct iomap_iter 
> *iter,
>         if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_INTEGRITY)
>                 fs_bio_integrity_alloc(bio);
>         submit_bio(bio);
> +
> +       ctx->read_ctx = NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_bio_submit_read_endio);
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 8d4806dc46d4..06a216d37548 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
>
> @@ -642,12 +649,12 @@ void iomap_read_folio(const struct iomap_ops *ops,
>                 fsverity_readahead(ctx->vi, folio->index,
>                                    folio_nr_pages(folio));
>
> -       while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
> +       while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) {
> +               iomap_submit_read(&iter, ctx, false);
>                 iter.status = iomap_read_folio_iter(&iter, ctx,
>                                 &bytes_submitted);

should the submit_read happen after the iomap_read_folio_iter() /
iomap_readahead_iter() instaed of before? From what I see, it looks
like iomap_submit_read() would hold the iter state of the next
mapping. It seems like in iomap_bio_submit_read_endio(), the
iter->iomap.flags would be the next extent's flags instead of the one
that needs to be submitted?

Thanks,
Joanne

Reply via email to