> Right now I've only really looked at the jfs patch, since that's what > I'm the most familiar with. I'll try to take a look at the rest of them > later.
Thank you! > I don't have a strong opinion for or against the function and your > design. The only potential problem I see in the approach is that > the .trash directory may conflict with some other use of the same name. > Since this is primarily vfs function, you'll probably get a wider > audience on linux-fsdevel. Well, I guess lost+found has the same problem but it is not a problem at all to pick some other (longer) name. > Have you considered putting ALL of the function in the vfs layer? It > looks like this could be done without touching any code in the > individual file systems. Unfortunately, we need some file system-specific code to access per-file secure deletion and per-file trash bit attributes. These attributes are supported only by some file systems and in different ways. We need no file system-specific code to support trash-bin deletion for whole file systems. Nikolai. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
