On Apr 02, 2007 14:47 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 15:43 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > This patch adds a 32-bit i_version_hi field to ext4_inode, which can be
> > used for 64-bit inode versions. This field will store the higher 32 bits of
> > the version, while Jean Noel's patch has added support to store the lower
> > 32-bits in osd1.linux1.l_i_version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.20/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.20.orig/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.20/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
> > @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ struct ext4_inode {
> > __le32 i_atime_extra; /* extra Access time (nsec << 2 |
> > epoch) */
> > __le32 i_crtime; /* File Creation time */
> > __le32 i_crtime_extra; /* extra File Creation time (nsec << 2 |
> > epoch) */
> > + __u32 i_version_hi; /* high 32 bits for 64-bit version */
> > };
> >
>
> Any reason not using __le32 for the i_version_hi?
Not really. I've also asked Kalpak to run sparse with Shaggy's flags
against the other patches to fix up any similar issues.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
