On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:04:43 -0600
"Andreas Dilger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/10/07, Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @@ -1254,7 +1254,8 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors (struct super_block
> > * sb)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_groups_count; i++)
> > {
> > - if (i == sbi->s_groups_count - 1)
> > + if (i == sbi->s_groups_count - 1 ||
> > EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
> > + EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG))
> > last_block = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) - 1;
>
> No need to check this featyre for every group, once at the beginning
> of the function is enough.
>
Do you mean something like the original patch?
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2007/07/12/20
Wouldn't we need to check all the descriptor for corruption if checksum
is not enable on the filesystem?
-JRS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
