On 02/11, Chao Yu wrote: > From: Leo Stone <leocst...@gmail.com> > > The syzbot reproducer mounts a f2fs image, then tries to unlink an > existing file. However, the unlinked file already has a link count of 0 > when it is read for the first time in do_read_inode(). > > Add a check to sanity_check_inode() for i_nlink == 0. > > [Chao Yu: rebase the code] > Reported-by: syzbot+b01a36acd7007e273...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b01a36acd7007e273a83 > Fixes: 39a53e0ce0df ("f2fs: add superblock and major in-memory structure") > Signed-off-by: Leo Stone <leocst...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> > --- > - no logic change, just rebase the code to last dev-test branch > fs/f2fs/inode.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > index d6ad7810df69..543fb942bec1 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > @@ -386,6 +386,12 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, > struct page *node_page) > } > } > > + if (inode->i_nlink == 0) { > + f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx) has a link count of 0", > + __func__, inode->i_ino); > + return false; > + }
This gives a wrong EFSCORRUPTED when recoverying orphan inodes. f2fs_recover_orphan_inodes -> f2fs_iget_retry -> orphan inode can have i_nlink = 0. > + > return true; > } > > -- > 2.48.1.502.g6dc24dfdaf-goog _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel