On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:17 PM Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/25 04:25, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 12:05 AM Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
> > <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a regression testcase to check whether we will handle database
> >> inode dirty status correctly:
> >> 1. mount f2fs image w/ timeout fault injection option
> >> 2. create a regular file, and write data into the file
> >> 3. start transaction on the file (via F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> >> 4. write transaction data to the file
> >> 5. commit and end the transaction (via F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> >> 6. meanwhile loop call fsync in parallel
> >> Before f098aeba04c9 ("f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic
> >> file"), database file may become corrupted after atomic write while
> >> there is concurrent dirty inode flush in background.
> >>
> >> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehoje...@google.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
> >> ---
> >> v2:
> >> - fix description of test steps
> >> - add missing "_require_kernel_config CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION"
> >> - add missing "_require_command "$F2FS_IO_PROG" f2fs_io"
> >> - put correct filesize in the golden output
> >>  tests/f2fs/013     | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  tests/f2fs/013.out |  2 ++
> >>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100755 tests/f2fs/013
> >>  create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/013.out
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/013 b/tests/f2fs/013
> >> new file mode 100755
> >> index 00000000..4cf56840
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tests/f2fs/013
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> >> +#! /bin/bash
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +# Copyright (c) 2025 Chao Yu.  All Rights Reserved.
> >> +#
> >> +# FS QA Test No. f2fs/013
> >> +#
> >> +# This is a regression testcase to check whether we will handle database
> >> +# inode dirty status correctly:
> >> +# 1. mount f2fs image w/ timeout fault injection option
> >> +# 2. create a regular file, and write data into the file
> >> +# 3. start transaction on the file (via F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> >> +# 4. write transaction data to the file
> >> +# 5. commit and end the transaction (via F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> >> +# 6. meanwhile loop call fsync in parallel
> >> +# Before f098aeba04c9 ("f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic
> >> +# file"), database file may become corrupted after atomic write while
> >> +# there is concurrent dirty inode flush in background.
> >> +#
> >> +. ./common/preamble
> >> +_begin_fstest auto quick
> >> +_require_kernel_config CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
> >> +_require_command "$F2FS_IO_PROG" f2fs_io
> >> +
> >> +_cleanup()
> >> +{
> >> +       [ -n "$atomic_write_pid" ] && kill -9 $atomic_write_pid
> >> +       wait
> >> +       cd /
> >> +       rm -r -f $tmp.*
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit f098aeba04c9 \
> >> +       "f2fs: fix to avoid atomicity corruption of atomic file"
> >> +
> >> +_require_scratch
> >> +
> >> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> >> +# note that it relis on FAULT_TIMEOUT fault injection support in f2fs
> >
> > relis -> relies
>
> Will fix.
>
> >
> >> +_scratch_mount "-o fault_injection=1,fault_type=4194304" >> $seqres.full
> >> +
> >> +dbfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/file.db
> >> +
> >> +# initialize database file
> >> +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 4k" -c "fsync" -f $dbfile >> $seqres.full
> >> +
> >> +# sync filesystem to clear dirty inode
> >> +sync
> >> +
> >> +# start atomic_write on src.db database file and commit transaction
> >> +$F2FS_IO_PROG write 1 0 2 zero atomic_commit $dbfile >> $seqres.full &
> >
> > I think we might have some timing issues here like background f2fs_io
> > ends earlier than foreground fsync() loop.
>
> What about adding a sysfs entry to control timeout, by default it's
> 1 second, we can tune it to 5 second for this case?

Ah, so TIMEOUT fault will induce 1 second delay in the kernel path?
Then, I am okay with that.

>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >> +atomic_write_pid=$!
> >> +
> >> +# call fsync to flush dirty inode of database file in parallel
> >> +for ((j=0;j<1000;j++)) do
> >> +       $F2FS_IO_PROG fsync $dbfile >> $seqres.full
> >> +done
> >> +
> >> +wait $atomic_write_pid
> >> +unset atomic_write_pid
> >> +
> >> +# flush dirty data and drop cache
> >> +sync
> >> +echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> >> +
> >> +stat $dbfile -c %s
> >> +
> >> +rm $dbfile
> >> +sync
> >> +
> >> +status=0
> >> +exit
> >> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/013.out b/tests/f2fs/013.out
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 00000000..d9271f75
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tests/f2fs/013.out
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> >> +QA output created by 013
> >> +8192
> >> --
> >> 2.49.0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to