On 5/8/25 15:47, yohan.joung wrote:
> when performing buffered writes in a large section,
> overhead is incurred due to the iteration through
> ckpt_valid_blocks within the section.
> when SEGS_PER_SEC is 128, this overhead accounts for 20% within
> the f2fs_write_single_data_page routine.
> as the size of the section increases, the overhead also grows.
> to handle this problem ckpt_valid_blocks is
> added within the section entries.
> 
> Test
> insmod null_blk.ko nr_devices=1 completion_nsec=1  submit_queues=8
> hw_queue_depth=64 max_sectors=512 bs=4096 memory_backed=1
> make_f2fs /dev/block/nullb0
> make_f2fs -s 128 /dev/block/nullb0
> fio --bs=512k --size=1536M --rw=write --name=1
> --filename=/mnt/test_dir/seq_write
> --ioengine=io_uring --iodepth=64 --end_fsync=1
> 
> before
> SEGS_PER_SEC 1
> 2556MiB/s
> SEGS_PER_SEC 128
> 2145MiB/s
> 
> after
> SEGS_PER_SEC 1
> 2556MiB/s
> SEGS_PER_SEC 128
> 2556MiB/s
> 
> Signed-off-by: yohan.joung <yohan.jo...@sk.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  fs/f2fs/segment.h | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 671bc5a8fd4a..7a53f2d8a474 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static void update_segment_mtime(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
>   * that the consecutive input blocks belong to the same segment.
>   */
>  static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct 
> seg_entry *se,
> -                             block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
> +                             unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned 
> int offset, int del)
>  {
>       bool exist;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> @@ -2492,15 +2492,22 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_release(struct 
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_ent
>                               f2fs_test_and_clear_bit(offset + i, 
> se->discard_map))
>                       sbi->discard_blks++;
>  
> -             if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +             if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +                     sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
> +#endif
> +             if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset + i, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
>                       se->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 1;
> +                     if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +                             get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks -= 
> 1;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       return del;
>  }
>  
>  static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct 
> seg_entry *se,
> -                             block_t blkaddr, unsigned int offset, int del)
> +                             unsigned int segno, block_t blkaddr, unsigned 
> int offset, int del)
>  {
>       bool exist;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> @@ -2532,13 +2539,23 @@ static int update_sit_entry_for_alloc(struct 
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct seg_entry
>        * SSR should never reuse block which is checkpointed
>        * or newly invalidated.
>        */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +     if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +             sanity_check_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
> +#endif

How about doing sanity check after ckpt_valid_blocks update?

>       if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
> -             if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +             if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
>                       se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
> +                     if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +                             get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
> +             }
>       }
>  
> -     if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> +     if (!f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map)) {
>               se->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
> +             if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +                     get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks += del;
> +     }
>  
>       return del;
>  }
> @@ -2569,9 +2586,9 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> block_t blkaddr, int del)
>  
>       /* Update valid block bitmap */
>       if (del > 0) {
> -             del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, del);
> +             del = update_sit_entry_for_alloc(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, 
> offset, del);
>       } else {
> -             del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, blkaddr, offset, 
> del);
> +             del = update_sit_entry_for_release(sbi, se, segno, blkaddr, 
> offset, del);
>       }
>  
>       __mark_sit_entry_dirty(sbi, segno);
> @@ -4700,12 +4717,16 @@ void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> struct cp_control *cpc)
>                                       &sit_in_journal(journal, offset));
>                               check_block_count(sbi, segno,
>                                       &sit_in_journal(journal, offset));
> +                             if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +                                     set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
>                       } else {
>                               sit_offset = SIT_ENTRY_OFFSET(sit_i, segno);
>                               seg_info_to_raw_sit(se,
>                                               &raw_sit->entries[sit_offset]);
>                               check_block_count(sbi, segno,
>                                               &raw_sit->entries[sit_offset]);
> +                             if (__is_large_section(sbi))
> +                                     set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
>                       }

Move here for cleanup?

if (__is_large_section(sbi))
        set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);

How about adding sanity check here as well?

>  
>                       __clear_bit(segno, bitmap);
> @@ -5029,6 +5050,12 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>       }
>       up_read(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
>  
> +     /* update ckpt_ckpt_valid_block */
> +     if (__is_large_section(sbi)) {
> +             for (unsigned int segno = 0; segno < MAIN_SEGS(sbi); segno += 
> SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi))

Let's keep the style of defining variable outside of 'for' statement.

> +                     set_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno);
> +     }

do sanity check here?

> +
>       if (err)
>               return err;
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> index 5777b385e7d2..ebc90d3cb57c 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> @@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct seg_entry {
>  
>  struct sec_entry {
>       unsigned int valid_blocks;      /* # of valid blocks in a section */
> +     unsigned int ckpt_valid_blocks; /* # of valid blocks last cp in a 
> section */
>  };
>  
>  #define MAX_SKIP_GC_COUNT                    16
> @@ -347,22 +348,52 @@ static inline unsigned int get_valid_blocks(struct 
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  static inline unsigned int get_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>                               unsigned int segno, bool use_section)
>  {
> -     if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi)) {
> -             unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> -             unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno);
> -             unsigned int blocks = 0;
> -             int i;
> +     if (use_section && __is_large_section(sbi))
> +             return get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
> +     else
> +             return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void set_ckpt_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> +             unsigned int segno)
> +{
> +     unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> +     unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno);
> +     unsigned int blocks = 0;
> +     int i;
>  
> -             for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) {
> -                     struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno);
> +     for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) {
> +             struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno);
>  
> -                     blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks;
> -             }
> -             return blocks;
> +             blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks;
>       }
> -     return get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks;
> +     get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks = blocks;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS
> +static inline void sanity_check_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> +             unsigned int segno)
> +{
> +     unsigned int secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, segno);
> +     unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, secno);
> +     unsigned int blocks = 0;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < SEGS_PER_SEC(sbi); i++, start_segno++) {
> +             struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, start_segno);
> +
> +             blocks += se->ckpt_valid_blocks;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (blocks != get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks) {
> +             f2fs_err(sbi,
> +                     "Inconsistent ckpt valid blocks: "
> +                     "seg entry(%d) vs sec entry(%d) at secno %d",
> +                     blocks, get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks, 
> secno);
> +             f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> +     }
> +}
> +#endif

#else
static inline void sanity_check_valid_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
                        unsigned int segno)
{
}
#endif

Then we don't need to cover sanity_check_valid_blocks() invoking w/
CONFIG_F2FS_CHECK_FS.

Thanks,

>  static inline void seg_info_from_raw_sit(struct seg_entry *se,
>                                       struct f2fs_sit_entry *rs)
>  {



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to