On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:01:26PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > This patch introduces a new address operation, a_ops->ra_folio_order(), which > proposes a new folio order based on the adjusted order for page_cache_sync_ra. > > Hence, each filesystem can set the desired minimum order of folio allocation > when requesting fadvise(POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED).
Again, you've said what but not why. Does the mm code not ramp up the folio order sufficiently quickly? What are you trying to accomplish? _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
