Gu Zheng <[email protected]> writes: > As we remove the target single node, so list_for_each is enought, in order to > clean up, we use list_for_each_entry instead. > > Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <[email protected]> > --- > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 5 ++--- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > index 290db04..87f7bc2 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c > @@ -237,13 +237,12 @@ out: > > void remove_orphan_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino) > { > - struct list_head *this, *next, *head; > + struct list_head *head; > struct orphan_inode_entry *orphan; > > mutex_lock(&sbi->orphan_inode_mutex); > head = &sbi->orphan_inode_list; > - list_for_each_safe(this, next, head) { > - orphan = list_entry(this, struct orphan_inode_entry, list); > + list_for_each_entry(orphan, head, list) { > if (orphan->ino == ino) { > list_del(&orphan->list); > kmem_cache_free(orphan_entry_slab, orphan);
you have meant list_for_each_entry_safe, haven't you? -- Nikola ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
