Hi Kim,
On 11/20/2013 09:31 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:

> Hi Gu,
> 
> IMO, there is no reason to cover the list header by the lock.
> In any flows, sbi should have the header all the time.

Yes, you're right.

> What is your opinion?

Moving the list_head initialization into the lock protection region, so
that we can ignore the list change during the gap(initialization<-->use).
And on the other side, it can keep the code style uniform for better
maintenance.

Regards,
Gu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 2013-11-19 (화), 18:03 +0800, Gu Zheng:
>> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
>>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index f884589..1de70cc 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -511,8 +511,8 @@ void add_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>  void remove_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>  {
>>      struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_SB(inode->i_sb);
>> -    struct list_head *head = &sbi->dir_inode_list;
>> -    struct list_head *this;
>> +
>> +    struct list_head *this, *head;
>>  
>>      if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
>>              return;
>> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ void remove_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>              return;
>>      }
>>  
>> +    head = &sbi->dir_inode_list;
>>      list_for_each(this, head) {
>>              struct dir_inode_entry *entry;
>>              entry = list_entry(this, struct dir_inode_entry, list);
>> @@ -544,11 +545,13 @@ void remove_dirty_dir_inode(struct inode *inode)
>>  
>>  struct inode *check_dirty_dir_inode(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
>>  {
>> -    struct list_head *head = &sbi->dir_inode_list;
>> -    struct list_head *this;
>> +
>> +    struct list_head *this, *head;
>>      struct inode *inode = NULL;
>>  
>>      spin_lock(&sbi->dir_inode_lock);
>> +
>> +    head = &sbi->dir_inode_list;
>>      list_for_each(this, head) {
>>              struct dir_inode_entry *entry;
>>              entry = list_entry(this, struct dir_inode_entry, list);
>> @@ -563,11 +566,13 @@ struct inode *check_dirty_dir_inode(struct 
>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
>>  
>>  void sync_dirty_dir_inodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  {
>> -    struct list_head *head = &sbi->dir_inode_list;
>> +    struct list_head *head;
>>      struct dir_inode_entry *entry;
>>      struct inode *inode;
>>  retry:
>>      spin_lock(&sbi->dir_inode_lock);
>> +
>> +    head = &sbi->dir_inode_list;
>>      if (list_empty(head)) {
>>              spin_unlock(&sbi->dir_inode_lock);
>>              return;
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to