Hi Dongho,

At first, please write a patch under the correct rule.
(e.g., description)

About this change, it's negative.
When considering SSR, we need to take care of the following scenario.
- old segno : X
- new address : Z
- old curseg : Y
This means, a new block is supposed to be written to Z from X.
And Z is newly allocated in the same path from Y.

In that case, we should trigger locate_dirty_segment for Y, since
it was a current_segment and can be dirty owing to SSR.
But that was not included in the dirty list.

Thanks,

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:34:25AM +0000, Dongho Sim wrote:
> Hi, Chao.
> It's my mistake.
> 
> Thanks :-)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongho Sim <dh....@samsung.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 8a6e57d..7af4a8d 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -973,14 +973,12 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> struct page *page,
>  {
>       struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi);
>       struct curseg_info *curseg;
> -     unsigned int old_cursegno;
>  
>       curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
>  
>       mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
>  
>       *new_blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg);
> -     old_cursegno = curseg->segno;
>  
>       /*
>        * __add_sum_entry should be resided under the curseg_mutex
> @@ -1001,7 +999,6 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> struct page *page,
>        * since SSR needs latest valid block information.
>        */
>       refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
> -     locate_dirty_segment(sbi, old_cursegno);
>  
>       mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : ?超<chao2...@samsung.com> 工程?/SRC-Nanjing-Mobile Solution Lab/삼성전자
> Date : 2014-07-28 16:21 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] Remove an unnecessary line in 
> allocate_data_block.
> 
> Hi Dongho,
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > 
> > From: "Dongho Sim" 
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 1:51 PM
> > To: "Chao Yu" 
> > Cc: jaeg...@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] Remove an unnecessary line in 
> > allocate_data_block.
> > 
> > Yes, there was another one.
> > Thanks Chao, :-)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dongho Sim 
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 8a6e57d..3ab7749 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -980,7 +980,6 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> > struct page *page,
> >         mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex);
> > 
> >         *new_blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg);
> > -       old_cursegno = curseg->segno;
> 
> The definition of old_cursegno also should be removed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yu
> 
> > 
> >         /*
> >          * __add_sum_entry should be resided under the curseg_mutex
> > @@ -1001,7 +1000,6 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> > struct page *page,
> >          * since SSR needs latest valid block information.
> >          */
> >         refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
> > -       locate_dirty_segment(sbi, old_cursegno);
> > 
> >         mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
> > 
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > ------- Original Message -------
> > Sender : Chao Yu 
> > Date : 2014-07-28 14:35 (GMT+09:00)
> > Title : RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] Remove an unnecessary line in 
> > allocate_data_block.
> > 
> > Hi Dongho,
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dongho Sim [mailto:dh....@samsung.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 7:03 AM
> > > To: jaeg...@kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] Remove an unnecessary line in 
> > > allocate_data_block.
> > >
> > > Hi. There was an unnecessary line in function, allocate_data_block.
> > > It is already done in
> > >    refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > 
> > Agreed,
> > How about removing old_cursegno too as it's no longer used in 
> > allocate_data_block?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yu
> > 
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dongho Sim
> > > ---
> > >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 1 -
> > >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > index 8a6e57d..a3c7aae 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > @@ -1001,7 +1001,6 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> > > struct page *page,
> > >   * since SSR needs latest valid block information.
> > >   */
> > >   refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
> > > - locate_dirty_segment(sbi, old_cursegno);
> > >
> > >   mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
> > >
> > > --
> > > 1.9.1
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
> > > search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
> > > Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
> > > search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Infragistics Professional
> > Build stunning WinForms apps today!
> > Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
> > Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to