On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:30:14PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> 
> However, it's quite a can of worms you're opening here. Speed is
> easily quantified, and it may even be feasible to introduce some kind
> of boottime benchmark to select the fastest implementation available
> (like already exists for xor and raid6, for instance).
> @Herbert: was something like this ever proposed? And would you
> consider merging it if it were implemented adequately?

Up until now static priorities have been sufficient in selecting
the best implementation.  However, if you can show us a case where
a given implementation is slower on one host but faster on another
then sure we can add a run-time test and priority adjustment for it.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to