Protecting recovery flow by using cp_rwsem is not needed, since we have
prevent triggering any checkpoint by locking cp_mutex previously.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2...@samsung.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index acc21f2..c5daec5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -383,15 +383,11 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
struct inode *inode,
        start = start_bidx_of_node(ofs_of_node(page), fi);
        end = start + ADDRS_PER_PAGE(page, fi);
 
-       f2fs_lock_op(sbi);
-
        set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
 
        err = get_dnode_of_data(&dn, start, ALLOC_NODE);
-       if (err) {
-               f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
+       if (err)
                goto out;
-       }
 
        f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(dn.node_page, NODE);
 
@@ -456,7 +452,6 @@ static int do_recover_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct 
inode *inode,
        set_page_dirty(dn.node_page);
 err:
        f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
-       f2fs_unlock_op(sbi);
 out:
        f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_NOTICE,
                "recover_data: ino = %lx, recovered = %d blocks, err = %d",
-- 
2.5.2



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to