Hi!
In all my tests I intentionally didn't play with dir_level, to get an idea of
baseline performance. I also wasn't worried because my standard response to
slow random reads is dmcache, but now that I realised I can't use dmcache
with these drives, I got more interested in dir_level.
If I understand it correctly, higher values of dir_level potentially waste
more space but gain performance. However, I have no clue about what the
trade-off really is.
Could you explain what kind of extra space usage I can expect from higher
levels of dir_level, or what the values mean?
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
