Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luca Porzio (lporzio) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 4:05 PM
> To: [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Cc: ([email protected]); [email protected]; Ulf Hansson 
> ([email protected]);
> [email protected]; ([email protected]); [email protected]; Ulf 
> Hansson
> ([email protected]); [email protected]
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] REQ_META and Reliable write in eMMC
> 
> Hi,
> 
> By discussing in the MELS (Mobile & Embedded Linux Storage Forum) we are 
> deciding whether it
> is ok to remove the bonding between REQ_META and "Reliable Write" in eMMC 
> devices.
> We already got a first positive ack from FS developers here
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/97219
> 
> >This performance impact comes from the existing MMC SW driver solution where 
> >each IO request
> marked with
> >REQ_META is handled as a "Reliable Write" operation.
> >Pretty much as a as a FUA write access, a "Reliable write" means that the 
> >data will be
written
> to the
> >non-volatile memory.
> >Due to the fact that every REQ_META is immediately bypassing the internal 
> >cache of eMMC
device,
> write
> >performance is affected significantly.
> 
> Wanted also to check for side effects on F2FS.
> Please advise how critical is to send REQ_META as "Reliable Write"?

I don't think this kind 'Reliable' optimization should be done in eMMC
for f2fs, since f2fs has already kept the write reliable by using
WRITE_FLUSH | WRITE_FLUSH_FUA.

> Can REQ_META be sent as a regular Write operation?

Yes, I think so.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
>    Luca Porzio
>    Micron
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to