Hi Jaegeuk,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] f2fs: introduce new option for controlling data flush
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:38:27AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > > > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ enum {
> > > >         Opt_extent_cache,
> > > >         Opt_noextent_cache,
> > > >         Opt_noinline_data,
> > > > +       Opt_data_flush,
> > >
> > > Need Opt_nodata_flush too.
> >
> > We need this unless we set data_flush as a default option. Is that right?
> 
> I meant both of them.

Yeah, I know that. But the point I meant was:
Normally we can detect user's mount option by test_opt(DATA_FLUSH), but if
data_flush option was set as a default option in f2fs, we need to introduce
nodata_flush to indicate whether user want to disable it or not, because we
can't disable data_flush option by mount without it since f2fs will set
data_flush by itself.

So it seems nodata_flush is redundant unless data_flush is set by default.

How do you think of it?

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > >         Opt_nodiscard,
> > > >         Opt_err,
> > > >  };
> > > > @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ static match_table_t f2fs_tokens = {
> > > >         {Opt_extent_cache, "extent_cache"},
> > > >         {Opt_noextent_cache, "noextent_cache"},
> > > >         {Opt_noinline_data, "noinline_data"},
> > > > +       {Opt_data_flush, "data_flush"},
> > > >         {Opt_nodiscard, "nodiscard"},
> > > >         {Opt_err, NULL},
> > > >  };
> > > > @@ -411,6 +413,9 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, 
> > > > char *options)
> > > >                 case Opt_noinline_data:
> > > >                         clear_opt(sbi, INLINE_DATA);
> > > >                         break;
> > > > +               case Opt_data_flush:
> > > > +                       clear_opt(sbi, DATA_FLUSH);
> > > > +                       break;
> > > >                 default:
> > > >                         f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> > > >                                 "Unrecognized mount option \"%s\" or 
> > > > missing value",
> > > > @@ -694,6 +699,8 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, 
> > > > struct dentry *root)
> > > >                 seq_puts(seq, ",extent_cache");
> > > >         else
> > > >                 seq_puts(seq, ",noextent_cache");
> > > > +       if (test_opt(sbi, DATA_FLUSH))
> > > > +               seq_puts(seq, ",data_flush");
> > > >         seq_printf(seq, ",active_logs=%u", sbi->active_logs);
> > > >
> > > >         return 0;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.6.3
> > > >


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to