On 01/09/2016 07:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Seems like this is missing REQ_OP_FLUSH, which still hides as a write? >
I might have misunderstood what you wanted or am misunderstanding you now. I did not change the flush related code until the last patches. I added REQ_OP_FLUSH in patch: [PATCH 33/35] block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation commit 18dea20363ba245a47bc1bb54f6465b8a05b19af Author: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Date: Tue Jan 5 21:02:17 2016 -0600 block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation and I added the REQ_PREFLUSH flag in [PATCH 35/35] block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH commit 303dc6a7cc3673065538ba041562fcd833a619af Author: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Date: Thu Jan 7 18:17:03 2016 -0600 block, drivers, fs: rename REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH I did them in separate patches, because I was not sure if they were correct with what you requested before, and because they were a little more tricky because of how request_fn drivers, make_request_fn drivers, and dm-multipath handle flushes differently. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
