Hi, > f2fs_crc32/f2fs_crc_valid won't been invoked very often, so I don't think that would cause much overhead in calculation and make things slow. Right, the gain is not that big. But I think it still worth it. That's not much code changes for it.
> Moreover, we could suffer crash if any error occurrs in crypto_shash_update, > that would be a regression. ext4 uses that and ext4 is used more widely than f2fs, haven't seem any people complaint about that. Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
