mchri...@redhat.com writes: > The following patches begin to cleanup the request->cmd_flags and > bio->bi_rw mess. We currently use cmd_flags to specify the operation, > attributes and state of the request. For bi_rw we use it for similar > info and also the priority but then also have another bi_flags field > for state. At some point, we abused them so much we just made cmd_flags > 64 bits, so we could add more. > > The following patches seperate the operation (read, write discard, > flush, etc) from cmd_flags/bi_rw. > > This patchset was made against linux-next from today April 15 > (git tag next-20160415). > > I put a git tree here: > https://github.com/mikechristie/linux-kernel.git > The patches are in the op branch.
Hi, Mike, That git tree doesn't seem to exist. I did manage to apply your patch set on top of next-20160415, though. So... what testing did you do? ;-) I ran into the following problems: - git clone fails - yum segfaults - many blktrace/blkparse issues, including incorrect cpu recorded in traces, null task names, and blkparse outputting nothing for a trace file several gigabytes in size. After that, I decided to back out your patches and test the base linux-next kernel. That kernel has none of those issues. So, either I'm missing some dependencies, or I think we've got some issues to iron out before this thing goes in. Before I dig any further, am I missing something? Cheers, Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
