No need inc dirty pages under inode lock

Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 6402e93..3da6499 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -787,9 +787,9 @@ void update_dirty_page(struct inode *inode, struct page 
*page)
 
        spin_lock(&sbi->inode_lock[type]);
        __add_dirty_inode(inode, type);
-       inode_inc_dirty_pages(inode);
        spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[type]);
 
+       inode_inc_dirty_pages(inode);
        SetPagePrivate(page);
        f2fs_trace_pid(page);
 }
-- 
1.9.1


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to