On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:30:43AM -0700, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > I am not sure that I follow to your point. The F2FS has "feature" field > (__le32 feature) into on-disk superblock (struct f2fs_super_block). The > suggested patch introduces the new F2FS_FEATURE_16TB_SUPPORT flag. And > it looks like as your comment.
It does, but at the same time you also introduce a major version superblock field. > So, necessary changes in on-disk layout for 16+TB volumes support will > be incompatible with current available version of F2FS driver. It means > that, anyway, we need to increase version of on-disk layout (major_ver > of struct f2fs_super_block). The presence of superblock's version and > F2FS_FEATURE_16TB_SUPPORT flag will be very useful for consistency > checking by fsck tool. Why is the feature not enough for that? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
