Hi Yunlei,
The problem may be the above stale segno.
How about this?
---
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index de6c41c..8a0ed89 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -908,10 +908,12 @@ gc_more:
* enough free sections, we should flush dent/node blocks and do
* garbage collections.
*/
- if (__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type) || prefree_segments(sbi))
+ if (__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type) ||
prefree_segments(sbi)) {
+ segno = NULL_SEGNO;
write_checkpoint(sbi, &cpc);
- else if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0))
+ } else if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0)) {
write_checkpoint(sbi, &cpc);
+ }
}
if (segno == NULL_SEGNO && !__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type))
--
2.8.3
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:30:29PM +0800, Yunlei He wrote:
> previous segment selected may become free after write_checkpoint,
> so here, we select victim again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/gc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index de6c41c..704e2e1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ gc_more:
> write_checkpoint(sbi, &cpc);
> }
>
> - if (segno == NULL_SEGNO && !__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type))
> + if (!__get_victim(sbi, &segno, gc_type) && segno == NULL_SEGNO)
> goto stop;
> ret = 0;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow,
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
