Hi Jaegeuk,

On 2016/9/20 5:40, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:30:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
>>
>> Making updating of sbi flag atomic by using {test,set,clear}_bit,
>> otherwise in concurrency scenario, the flag could be updated incorrectly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index 9b4bbf2..c30f744b 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>>      struct proc_dir_entry *s_proc;          /* proc entry */
>>      struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super;     /* raw super block pointer */
>>      int valid_super_block;                  /* valid super block no */
>> -    int s_flag;                             /* flags for sbi */
>> +    unsigned long s_flag;                           /* flags for sbi */
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_ENCRYPTION
>>      u8 key_prefix[F2FS_KEY_DESC_PREFIX_SIZE];
>> @@ -1063,17 +1063,19 @@ static inline struct address_space 
>> *NODE_MAPPING(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  
>>  static inline bool is_sbi_flag_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int 
>> type)
>>  {
>> -    return sbi->s_flag & (0x01 << type);
>> +    return test_bit(type, &sbi->s_flag);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void set_sbi_flag(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int type)
>>  {
>> -    sbi->s_flag |= (0x01 << type);
>> +    if (!test_bit(type, &sbi->s_flag))
>> +            set_bit(type, &sbi->s_flag);
> 
> The set_bit() is enough, no?

It seems OK to me, let me send v2.

Thanks,

> 
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline void clear_sbi_flag(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int 
>> type)
>>  {
>> -    sbi->s_flag &= ~(0x01 << type);
>> +    if (test_bit(type, &sbi->s_flag))
>> +            clear_bit(type, &sbi->s_flag);
> 
> ditto.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>  }
>>  
>>  static inline unsigned long long cur_cp_version(struct f2fs_checkpoint *cp)
>> -- 
>> 2.7.2
> 
> .
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to