gcc is unsure about the use of last_ofs_in_node, which might happen
without a prior initialization:
fs/f2fs//git/arm-soc/fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_map_blocks’:
fs/f2fs/data.c:799:54: warning: ‘last_ofs_in_node’ may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (prealloc && dn.ofs_in_node != last_ofs_in_node + 1) {
As pointed out by Chao Yu, the code is actually correct as 'prealloc'
is only set if the last_ofs_in_node has been set, the two always
get updated together.
This initializes last_ofs_in_node to dn.ofs_in_node for each
new dnode at the start of the 'next_block' loop, which at that
point is a correct initialization as well. I assume that compilers
that correctly track the contents of the variables and do not
warn about the condition also figure out that they can eliminate
the extra assignment here.
Fixes: 46008c6d4232 ("f2fs: support in batch multi blocks preallocation")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index a59ea8e60040..6f01aaddfce9 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct
f2fs_map_blocks *map,
}
prealloc = 0;
- ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
+ last_ofs_in_node = ofs_in_node = dn.ofs_in_node;
end_offset = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_page, inode);
next_block:
--
2.9.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
