This can drop root inode, which can be caused by previous stale data.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
---
 mkfs/f2fs_format.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c b/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
index 2e9c19a..67965ed 100644
--- a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
+++ b/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
@@ -847,6 +847,10 @@ static int f2fs_write_super_block(void)
 static int discard_obsolete_dnode(struct f2fs_node *raw_node, u_int64_t offset)
 {
        u_int64_t next_blkaddr = 0;
+       u_int64_t root_inode_pos = get_sb(main_blkaddr);
+
+       /* only root inode was written before truncating dnodes */
+       root_inode_pos += c.cur_seg[CURSEG_HOT_NODE] * c.blks_per_seg;
 
        if (c.zoned_mode)
                return 0;
@@ -869,6 +873,9 @@ static int discard_obsolete_dnode(struct f2fs_node 
*raw_node, u_int64_t offset)
                        return -1;
                }
                offset = next_blkaddr;
+               /* should avoid recursive chain due to stale data */
+               if (offset == root_inode_pos)
+                       break;
        } while (1);
 
        return 0;
-- 
2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to