Does this means the reserved_blocks cannot be used by users by can be used by filesystem? If it can be used by filesystem, then this cannot ensure the flash device really reserve the
reserved_blocks space, right? The reserved_blocks is just for users?

On 2017/8/8 14:08, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/8/8 12:12, Yunlong Song wrote:
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.s...@huawei.com>
---
  fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 3 ++-
  fs/f2fs/super.c    | 9 +++++----
  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
index a3d0261..e288319 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
@@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ bool space_for_roll_forward(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
  {
        s64 nalloc = percpu_counter_sum_positive(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count);
- if (sbi->last_valid_block_count + nalloc > sbi->user_block_count)
+       if (sbi->last_valid_block_count + nalloc +
+                       sbi->reserved_blocks > sbi->user_block_count)
I think we can treat reserved blocks as over-provision space in f2fs, so it
would be safe to store invalid data (may become valid during recovery) there.
Anyway, it OK to remain old condition judgment.

                return false;
        return true;
  }
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 4c1bdcb..c644bf5 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -946,6 +946,7 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct 
kstatfs *buf)
        u64 id = huge_encode_dev(sb->s_bdev->bd_dev);
        block_t total_count, user_block_count, start_count, ovp_count;
        u64 avail_node_count;
+       block_t avail_user_block_count;
total_count = le64_to_cpu(sbi->raw_super->block_count);
        user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count;
@@ -953,16 +954,16 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct 
kstatfs *buf)
        ovp_count = SM_I(sbi)->ovp_segments << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
        buf->f_type = F2FS_SUPER_MAGIC;
        buf->f_bsize = sbi->blocksize;
+       avail_user_block_count = user_block_count - sbi->reserved_blocks;
buf->f_blocks = total_count - start_count;
        buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) + ovp_count;
-       buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) -
-                                               sbi->reserved_blocks;
+       buf->f_bavail = avail_user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi);
avail_node_count = sbi->total_node_count - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM; - if (avail_node_count > user_block_count) {
-               buf->f_files = user_block_count;
+       if (avail_node_count > avail_user_block_count) {
Likewise f_blocks calculation, the f_files one doesn't need to consider
reserved_blocks.

Thanks,

+               buf->f_files = avail_user_block_count;
                buf->f_ffree = buf->f_bavail;
        } else {
                buf->f_files = avail_node_count;


.


--
Thanks,
Yunlong Song



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to