Hi Chao,

On 10/26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > 
> > On 2017/10/26 16:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Chao,
> > > 
> > > It seems this is a critical problem, so let me integrate this patch with 
> > > your
> > > initial patch "f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size".
> > > Let me know, if you have any other concern.
> > 
> > Better. ;)
> > 
> > Please add commit message of this patch into initial patch "f2fs: support
> > flexible inline xattr size".

BTW, I read the patch again, and couldn't catch the problem actually.
We didn't assign inline_xattr all the time, instead do if inline_xattr
is set. Have you done some tests with this? I'm failing tests with these
changes.

> > 
> > And please fix related issue in f2fs-tools with below diff code:
> 
> Okay, merged.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > ---
> >  include/f2fs_fs.h | 9 ++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/f2fs_fs.h b/include/f2fs_fs.h
> > index 2db7495804fd..a0e15ba85d97 100644
> > --- a/include/f2fs_fs.h
> > +++ b/include/f2fs_fs.h
> > @@ -1047,11 +1047,14 @@ static inline int __get_extra_isize(struct 
> > f2fs_inode *inode)
> >  extern struct f2fs_configuration c;
> >  static inline int get_inline_xattr_addrs(struct f2fs_inode *inode)
> >  {
> > -   if (!(inode->i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_XATTR))
> > +   if ((c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_EXTRA_ATTR)) &&
> > +           (c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR)))
> > +           return le16_to_cpu(inode->i_inline_xattr_size);
> > +   else if (!(inode->i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_XATTR) &&
> > +           (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
> >             return 0;
> > -   if (!(c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR)))
> > +   else
> >             return DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > -   return le16_to_cpu(inode->i_inline_xattr_size);
> >  }
> > 
> >  #define get_extra_isize(node)      __get_extra_isize(&node->i)
> > -- 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > On 10/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> > >> Previously, in inode layout, we will always reserve 200 bytes for inline
> > >> xattr space no matter the inode enables inline xattr feature or not, due
> > >> to this reason, max inline size of inode is fixed, but now, if inline
> > >> xattr is not enabled, max inline size of inode will be enlarged by 200
> > >> bytes, for regular and symlink inode, it will be safe to reuse resevered
> > >> space as they are all zero, but for directory, we need to keep the
> > >> reservation for stablizing directory structure.
> > >>
> > >> Reported-by: Sheng Yong <shengyo...@huawei.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |  5 +----
> > >>  fs/f2fs/inode.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > >>  fs/f2fs/namei.c |  2 ++
> > >>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > >> index 2af1d31ae74b..7ddd0d085e3b 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > >> @@ -2393,10 +2393,7 @@ static inline int get_extra_isize(struct inode 
> > >> *inode)
> > >>  static inline int f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(struct super_block 
> > >> *sb);
> > >>  static inline int get_inline_xattr_addrs(struct inode *inode)
> > >>  {
> > >> -        if (!f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode))
> > >> -                return 0;
> > >> -        if (!f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(F2FS_I_SB(inode)->sb))
> > >> -                return DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > >> +
> > >>          return F2FS_I(inode)->i_inline_xattr_size;
> > >>  }
> > >>  
> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> > >> index bb876737e653..7f31b22c9efa 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> > >> @@ -232,10 +232,19 @@ static int do_read_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > >>          fi->i_extra_isize = f2fs_has_extra_attr(inode) ?
> > >>                                          le16_to_cpu(ri->i_extra_isize) 
> > >> : 0;
> > >>  
> > >> -        if (!f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode))
> > >> -                fi->i_inline_xattr_size = 0;
> > >> -        else if (f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(sbi->sb))
> > >> +        /*
> > >> +         * Previously, we will always reserve 
> > >> DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS size
> > >> +         * space for inline xattr datas, if inline xattr is not 
> > >> enabled, we
> > >> +         * can expect all zero in reserved area, so for regular or 
> > >> symlink,
> > >> +         * it will be safe to reuse reserved area, but for directory, we
> > >> +         * should keep the reservation for stablizing directory 
> > >> structure.
> > >> +         */
> > >> +        if (f2fs_has_extra_attr(inode) &&
> > >> +                f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(sbi->sb))
> > >>                  fi->i_inline_xattr_size = 
> > >> le16_to_cpu(ri->i_inline_xattr_size);
> > >> +        else if (!f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode) &&
> > >> +                (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
> > >> +                fi->i_inline_xattr_size = 0;
> > >>          else
> > >>                  fi->i_inline_xattr_size = DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
> > >>  
> > >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > >> index e6f86d5d97b9..a1c56a14c191 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > >> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_new_inode(struct inode *dir, 
> > >> umode_t mode)
> > >>                  f2fs_sb_has_flexible_inline_xattr(sbi->sb) &&
> > >>                  f2fs_has_inline_xattr(inode))
> > >>                  F2FS_I(inode)->i_inline_xattr_size = 
> > >> sbi->inline_xattr_size;
> > >> +        else
> > >> +                F2FS_I(inode)->i_inline_xattr_size = 0;
> > >>  
> > >>          if (test_opt(sbi, INLINE_DATA) && f2fs_may_inline_data(inode))
> > >>                  set_inode_flag(inode, FI_INLINE_DATA);
> > >> -- 
> > >> 2.13.1.388.g69e6b9b4f4a9
> > > 
> > > .
> > > 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to