On 10/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/10/27 11:43, Sun Qiuyang wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > 
> > I noticed that the log of the commit:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev-test&id=7e515b31d44dcd20a98c938dfdc21877a30042a0
> > 
> > used a new expression as follows:
> > 
> > sbi->fggc_threshold = div_u64((u64)(main_count - ovp_count) *
> >                     BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi), (main_count - resv_count));
> > 
> > This might originate from my patch below, which has been merged into the 
> > f2fs-dev branch of kernel/git/chao/linux.git, but not 
> > kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git yet.
> > 
> > So, would you like to consider merging my patch as well?
> 
> As you see, I have reviewed this patch, since it looks good to me. ;)
> But forgot to remind Jaegeuk to merge this, sorry.

So, why do we have to do this? We're calculating this based on # of blocks.
If we don't use this patch, didn't we need the Chao's patch as well?

Thanks,

> 
> Anyway, how do you think of this cleanup? Jaegeuk.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 
> >> On 2017/10/17 20:42, sunqiuyang wrote:
> >>> From: Qiuyang Sun <sunqiuy...@huawei.com>
> >>>
> >>> Do not need to convert segment counts to blocks for this calculation.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Qiuyang Sun <sunqiuy...@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>>  fs/f2fs/gc.c | 10 +++++-----
> >>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> index 197ebf4..9df8cae 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>> @@ -1073,16 +1073,16 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync,
> >>>
> >>>  void build_gc_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>  {
> >>> - u64 main_count, resv_count, ovp_count;
> >>> + unsigned int main_count, resv_count, ovp_count;
> >>>
> >>>   DIRTY_I(sbi)->v_ops = &default_v_ops;
> >>>
> >>>   /* threshold of # of valid blocks in a section for victims of FG_GC */
> >>> - main_count = SM_I(sbi)->main_segments << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
> >>> - resv_count = SM_I(sbi)->reserved_segments << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
> >>> - ovp_count = SM_I(sbi)->ovp_segments << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
> >>> + main_count = SM_I(sbi)->main_segments;
> >>> + resv_count = SM_I(sbi)->reserved_segments;
> >>> + ovp_count = SM_I(sbi)->ovp_segments;
> >>>
> >>> - sbi->fggc_threshold = div64_u64((main_count - ovp_count) *
> >>> + sbi->fggc_threshold = div_u64((u64)(main_count - ovp_count) *
> >>>                           BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi), (main_count - resv_count));
> >>>
> >>>   /* give warm/cold data area from slower device */
> >>>
> >>
> >> .
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > .
> > 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to