On 2017/10/31 17:34, Sheng Yong wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017/10/31 15:06, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/10/31 9:38, Sheng Yong wrote:
>>> Do not set fix_on if it is allowed by user.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyo...@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fsck/main.c  | 2 +-
>>>   fsck/mount.c | 2 +-
>>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
>>> index c9411eb..93037e1 100644
>>> --- a/fsck/main.c
>>> +++ b/fsck/main.c
>>> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void do_fsck(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>                             c.fix_on = 1;
>>>                     break;
>>>             }
>>> -   } else {
>>> +   } else if (c.preen_mode) {
>>
>> Needs to update below comments?
> I think the new condition hits comment 3 ("fsck -p 1 && error is detected, 
> then
> bug_on is set fix_on = 1 here, so that fsck can fix errors automatically"). 
> The
> condition was missing and the comment seems not that correct before ;)

OK, so please fix it in your patch. :)

Thanks,

> 
> thanks,
> Sheng
>>
>>>             /*
>>>              * we can hit this in 3 situations:
>>>              *  1. fsck -f, fix_on has already been set to 1 when
>>> diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
>>> index 29af3b7..faa9bc8 100644
>>> --- a/fsck/mount.c
>>> +++ b/fsck/mount.c
>>> @@ -1879,6 +1879,7 @@ void nullify_nat_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32 
>>> nid)
>>>   
>>>     memset(&nat_block->entries[entry_off], 0,
>>>                                     sizeof(struct f2fs_nat_entry));
>>> +   FIX_MSG("Remove nid [0x%x] in NAT\n", nid);
>>
>> How about adding debug message in separated patch?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>   
>>>     ret = dev_write_block(nat_block, block_addr);
>>>     ASSERT(ret >= 0);
>>> @@ -2031,7 +2032,6 @@ void build_nat_area_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>                              */
>>>                             ASSERT_MSG("Invalid nat entry[0]: "
>>>                                     "blk_addr[0x%x]\n", ni.blk_addr);
>>> -                           c.fix_on = 1;
>>>                             fsck->chk.valid_nat_entry_cnt--;
>>>                     }
>>>   
>>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to