Since the variable release is only nonzero when another unlikely
case occurs, use unlikely() on it seems logical.
Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode...@samsung.com>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 71fbba96..0f01af0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct
f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
}
spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
- if (release)
+ if (unlikely(release))
dquot_release_reservation_block(inode, release);
f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, *count, true, true);
return 0;
--
2.7.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
