Hi Yunlei,

On 12/20, Yunlei He wrote:
> v4 -> v5 return err instead destory inode list for two reasons:
> i.  avoid duplicated destroy inode list in function recover_fsync_data.
> ii. report an error for recovery, and set need_fsck flag
>         
> Came across a dead loop in recovery like this:
> 
> ......
> [   24.680480s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597696
> [   24.698394s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597697
> [   24.724334s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724334s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724365s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724365s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724365s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724395s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> [   24.724426s][pid:320,cpu0,init]find_fsync_dnodes: blkaddr =13597698
> ......
> 
> Mount process will block in dead loop and fsck can do nothing with this
> error, This patch abandon recovery if node chain is cyclical.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> index d025aa8..a535ec2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,17 @@ static int find_fsync_dnodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, 
> struct list_head *head)
>                       return 0;
>  
>               page = get_tmp_page(sbi, blkaddr);
> +             if (PageChecked(page)) {
> +                     f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR, "Abandon looped node block 
> list");
> +                     err = -EINVAL;

Is there any problem, if we break here without error, so that we could recover
some of the inodes in the chain as best efforts?

Thanks,

> +                     break;
> +             }
> +
> +             /*
> +              * it's not needed to clear PG_checked flag in temp page since 
> we
> +              * will truncate all those pages in the end of recovery.
> +              */
> +             SetPageChecked(page);
>  
>               if (!is_recoverable_dnode(page))
>                       break;
> -- 
> 1.9.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to