Hi Chao,
On 2018/1/25 16:18, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/1/25 15:05, Gaoxiang (OS) wrote:
>> Previously, we attempt to flush the whole cp pack in a single bio,
>> however, when suddenly powering off at this time, we could get into
>> an extreme scenario that cp page1 and cp page2 are updated and
>> latest, but payload or current summaries are still partially outdated.
>> (see reliable write in the UFS specification)
>>
>> This patch submits the whole cp pack except cp page2 at first,
>> and then writes the cp page2 with an extra independent
>> bio with pre-io barrier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Change log from v1:
>> - Apply the review comments from Chao
>> - time data from "finish block_ops" to " finish checkpoint" (tested on
>> ARM64 with TOSHIBA 128GB UFS):
>> Before patch: 0.002273 0.001973 0.002789 0.005159 0.002050
>> After patch: 0.002502 0.001624 0.002487 0.003049 0.002696
>
> Looks not very stable.
>
The raw time is as follows, actually I think the time depends on the CPU
, CPU schedule and some other conditions...
We drop REQ_PREFLUSH and REQ_FUA in the first bio and the second bio is
only 4k.. It would not have obvious performance difference, I think.
before:
kworker/u16:3-220 [003] ...1 378.093580: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:3-220 [003] ...1 378.095468: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:3-220 [003] ...1 378.097741: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (1)
kworker/u16:1-97 [003] ...1 438.190720: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-97 [003] ...1 438.192693: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-97 [003] ...1 438.195540: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (2)
kworker/u16:4-238 [001] ...1 498.301875: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [001] ...1 498.304664: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [001] ...1 498.308997: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (3)
kworker/u16:4-238 [002] ...1 558.414151: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [002] ...1 558.417236: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [002] ...1 558.422395: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (4)
kworker/u16:4-238 [001] ...1 618.525854: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [001] ...1 618.527882: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [000] ...1 618.529932: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (5)
kworker/u16:4-238 [002] ...1 678.639271: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [002] ...1 678.644787: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [003] ...1 678.651480: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (6)
kworker/u16:1-97 [002] ...1 738.765589: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-97 [002] ...1 738.767638: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-97 [000] ...1 738.770752: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (7)
kworker/u16:4-238 [003] ...1 798.895281: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [003] ...1 798.897615: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:4-238 [001] ...1 798.902006: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (8)
kworker/u16:1-97 [003] ...1 859.021172: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-97 [003] ...1 859.022934: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-97 [003] ...1 859.024095: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (9)
kworker/u16:3-220 [002] ...1 919.133620: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:3-220 [002] ...1 919.135558: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:3-220 [002] ...1 919.137182: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (10)
after:
kworker/u16:3-222 [000] ...1 137.820152: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:3-222 [000] ...1 137.822471: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:3-222 [000] ...1 137.824973: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (1)
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 197.917060: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 197.919031: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 197.920655: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (2)
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 258.013014: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 258.014914: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 258.017401: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (3)
kworker/u16:0-6 [002] ...1 318.109930: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:0-6 [002] ...1 318.111908: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:0-6 [002] ...1 318.114957: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (4)
kworker/u16:1-96 [003] ...1 378.222490: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [003] ...1 378.224729: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 378.227425: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (5)
kworker/u16:1-96 [001] ...1 438.334204: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [001] ...1 438.337002: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [001] ...1 438.341479: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (6)
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 498.462207: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [002] ...1 498.465213: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:1-96 [003] ...1 498.469858: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (7)
kworker/u16:0-6 [003] ...1 558.589039: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:0-6 [003] ...1 558.591138: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:0-6 [002] ...1 558.594847: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (8)
kworker/u16:3-222 [003] ...1 618.702535: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:3-222 [003] ...1 618.708222: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:3-222 [003] ...1 618.724619: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (9)
kworker/u16:3-222 [002] ...1 678.830550: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = start block_ops
kworker/u16:3-222 [002] ...1 678.832785: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish block_ops
kworker/u16:3-222 [002] ...1 678.835356: f2fs_write_checkpoint:
dev = (259,44), checkpoint for Sync, state = finish checkpoint (10)
>> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index 14d2fed..70deb09 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -300,6 +300,36 @@ static int f2fs_write_meta_pages(struct address_space
>> *mapping,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static void commit_checkpoint_with_barrier(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>
> Minor, {commit,sync}_checkpoint will be OK to me, since we will decide to
> keep barrier in more deep places according to NOBARRIER mount option,
> instead of this function.
OK, I agree.
>
>> + void *src, block_t blk_addr)
>> +{
>> + struct writeback_control wbc = {
>> + .for_reclaim = 0,
>> + };
>> + struct page *page = grab_meta_page(sbi, blk_addr);
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + memcpy(page_address(page), src, PAGE_SIZE);
>> + set_page_dirty(page);
>> +
>> + f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, META, true);
>> + BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
>> + if (unlikely(!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)))
>> + BUG();
>
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, PageWriteback(page));
Will fix.
> f2fs_bug_on(sbi, unlikely(!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)));
>
I attempt to use
if (unlikely(!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
f2fs_bug_on(1);
since It is better to contain judgement only for assert-like functions
(In case that clear_page_dirty_for_io could be omited by changing BUG_ON
definition in the future).
>> +
>> + /* writeout cp page2 */
>
> Please keep defined terms as the same in all places:
>
> s/cp page2/cp pack 2 page
>
>> + err = __f2fs_write_meta_page(page, &wbc, FS_CP_META_IO);
>> + if (err) {
>> + f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
>> + f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
>> + return;
>
> How about f2fs_bug_on(sbi, err), since we should not fail in
> __f2fs_write_meta_page, right?
OK, will fix in that way.
>
>> + }
>> + f2fs_put_page(page, 0);
>> +
>> + /* submit checkpoint with barrier */
>> + f2fs_submit_merged_write(sbi, META_FLUSH);
>> +}
>> +
>> long sync_meta_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, enum page_type type,
>> long nr_to_write, enum iostat_type io_type)
>> {
>> @@ -1297,9 +1327,6 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> struct cp_control *cpc)
>> start_blk += NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE;
>> }
>>
>> - /* writeout checkpoint block */
>> - update_meta_page(sbi, ckpt, start_blk);
>> -
>> /* wait for previous submitted node/meta pages writeback */
>> wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi);
>>
>> @@ -1313,12 +1340,16 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>> struct cp_control *cpc)
>> sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
>> percpu_counter_set(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, 0);
>>
>> - /* Here, we only have one bio having CP pack */
>> - sync_meta_pages(sbi, META_FLUSH, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO);
>> + /* Here, we have one bio having CP pack except cp page2 */
>> + sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO);
>>
>> /* wait for previous submitted meta pages writeback */
>> wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi);
>
> /* wait for previous submitted meta pages writeback */
> if (!test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER)
> wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi);
>
OK.
Thanks,
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> + /* barrier and flush checkpoint cp page2 */
>> + commit_checkpoint_with_barrier(sbi, ckpt, start_blk);
>> + wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi);
>> +
>> release_ino_entry(sbi, false);
>>
>> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
