Hi Jaegeuk, On 2018/1/31 10:39, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 01/31, Gaoxiang (OS) wrote: >> Hi Jaegeuk, >> >> On 2018/1/31 10:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 01/26, Gaoxiang (OS) wrote: >>>> Hi Jaegeuk and Chao, >>>> >>>> On 2018/1/26 9:36, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>> On 2018/1/26 6:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Then, we don't need to wait for this as well as >>>>>> wait_on_all_pages_writeback() >>>>>> in the early stage in do_checkpoint()? >>>>>> >>>>>> So, it seems like we can modify like below: >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> 1. while (get_pages()) >>>>>> sync_meta_pages() >>>>>> 2. if (enabled_nat_bits()) >>>>>> while (get_pages()) >>>>>> sync_meta_pages() >>>>>> >>>>>> 3. wait_on_all_pages_writeback() >>>>>> -> remove >>>>> >>>>> Would meta area across two devices? if it would, we need to wait all meta >>>>> be persisted in second device before f2fs_flush_device_cache? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 4. f2fs_flush_device_cache() >>> >>> -> remove >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 5. update_meta_page() <- for first cp_block >>>>>> >>>>>> 6. update_meta_page()... <- payload >>>>>> >>>>>> 7. orphan writes >>>>>> >>>>>> 8. node_summary writes >>>>>> >>>>>> 9. update_meta_page() <- for last cp_block >>>>>> -> remove >>>>> >>>> >>>> - /* writeout checkpoint block */ >>>> - update_meta_page(sbi, ckpt, start_blk); >>>> - >>>> - /* wait for previous submitted node/meta pages writeback */ >>>> - wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi); >>>> - >>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) >>>> - return -EIO; >>>> - >>>> Could also be removed, too? >>>> >>>> filemap_fdatawait_range(NODE_MAPPING(sbi), 0, LLONG_MAX); >>>> filemap_fdatawait_range(META_MAPPING(sbi), 0, LLONG_MAX); >>> >>> -> remove >>> >>> Hmm, think so. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> 9.1 sync_meta_pages(META) to make sure all meta IOs are issued. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If I understand correctly, I have the same questions with Chao. >>>> It seems that META doesn't have another flush mechanism (eg. flush >>>> thread) other than sync_meta_pages? >>> >>> 9.2 f2fs_flush_device_cache(), if we have multiple devices. >>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 10. wait_on_all_pages_writeback() >>> >>> 10.1. (f2fs_cp_error()) >>> return -EIO; >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ---- >>>>>> Add) 11. commit_checkpoint() >>>>>> - update_meta_page() <- for last cp_block >>>>>> - sync_meta_pages(META_FLUSH) >>>>>> >>>>>> We don't need to wait for page_writeback any more. >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Apart from that, I think we should "wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi);" >>>> after META_FLUSH in case for pulluting the next checkpoint when the last >>>> cp block is failed to write with FUA? >>> >>> Next cp block won't be written by 10.1. >>> >> >> I think that 10.1 ensures the cp pack before the last cp_block was done. >> However, what if the last cp block writes fail later without FUA? > > Without FUA? The last cp_block is written by FUA, no?
quote " Apart from that, I think we should "wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi);" after META_FLUSH in case for pulluting the next checkpoint when the last cp block is failed to write with FUA? " what I meant is that the last cp_block should be written by FUA. we need to use META_FLUSH to write last cp_block, right? :) Thanks, > >> Should we need to ensure the last cp block going into device medium >> rather than device cache before switching to go into the next checkpoint >> (I mean we need to ensure writing to medium and then unblock_operation >> and quit write_checkpoint and go on fs operations)? >> >> Other parts seems OK for me :), I will sort out and resent a new patch. >> >> Thanks, >> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks all, >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @@ -1313,10 +1337,15 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info >>>>>>> *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc) >>>>>>> sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count; >>>>>>> percpu_counter_set(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, 0); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - /* Here, we only have one bio having CP pack */ >>>>>>> - sync_meta_pages(sbi, META_FLUSH, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO); >>>>>>> + /* Here, we have one bio having CP pack except cp pack 2 page */ >>>>>>> + sync_meta_pages(sbi, META, LONG_MAX, FS_CP_META_IO); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /* wait for previous submitted meta pages writeback */ >>>>>>> + if (!test_opt(sbi, NOBARRIER)) >>>>>> >>>>>> The above has nothing to do with this patch. >>>>> >>>>> We only need to use wait_on_all_pages_writeback to keep writeback order of >>>>> previous metadata and last cp pack metadata if barrier is on? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> + wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + /* barrier and flush checkpoint cp pack 2 page */ >>>>>>> + commit_checkpoint(sbi, ckpt, start_blk); >>>>>>> wait_on_all_pages_writeback(sbi); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> release_ino_entry(sbi, false); >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> 2.1.4 >>>>>> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
