>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sahitya Tummala [mailto:stumm...@codeaurora.org]
>Sent: Monday, March 05, 2018 6:24 PM
>To: heyunlei
>Cc: jaeg...@kernel.org; Yuchao (T); linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: check blkaddr more accuratly before 
>issue a bio
>
>On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:07:06PM +0800, Yunlei He wrote:
>> This patch check blkaddr more accuratly before issue a
>> write or read bio.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |  2 ++
>>  fs/f2fs/data.c       |  5 +++--
>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  1 +
>>  fs/f2fs/segment.h    | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index 5b2db75..bf77946 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ static struct page *__get_meta_page(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>> *sbi, pgoff_t index,
>>              .old_blkaddr = index,
>>              .new_blkaddr = index,
>>              .encrypted_page = NULL,
>> +            .is_meta = is_meta,
>>      };
>>
>>      if (unlikely(!is_meta))
>> @@ -162,6 +163,7 @@ int ra_meta_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t 
>> start, int nrpages,
>>              .op_flags = sync ? (REQ_META | REQ_PRIO) : REQ_RAHEAD,
>>              .encrypted_page = NULL,
>>              .in_list = false,
>> +            .is_meta = (type != META_POR),
>>      };
>>      struct blk_plug plug;
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> index 6c3c978..de036e8 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>> @@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ int f2fs_submit_page_bio(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>>      struct page *page = fio->encrypted_page ?
>>                      fio->encrypted_page : fio->page;
>>
>> +    verify_block_addr(fio, fio->new_blkaddr);
>>      trace_f2fs_submit_page_bio(page, fio);
>>      f2fs_trace_ios(fio, 0);
>>
>> @@ -428,8 +429,8 @@ int f2fs_submit_page_write(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
>>      }
>>
>>      if (fio->old_blkaddr != NEW_ADDR)
>> -            verify_block_addr(sbi, fio->old_blkaddr);
>> -    verify_block_addr(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr);
>> +            verify_block_addr(fio, fio->old_blkaddr);
>> +    verify_block_addr(fio, fio->new_blkaddr);
>>
>>      bio_page = fio->encrypted_page ? fio->encrypted_page : fio->page;
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index f6dc706..842adea 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -980,6 +980,7 @@ struct f2fs_io_info {
>>      bool submitted;         /* indicate IO submission */
>>      int need_lock;          /* indicate we need to lock cp_rwsem */
>>      bool in_list;           /* indicate fio is in io_list */
>> +    bool is_meta;           /* indicate borrow meta inode mapping or not */
>>      enum iostat_type io_type;       /* io type */
>>      struct writeback_control *io_wbc; /* writeback control */
>>  };
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> index dbb774aa..dabe400 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
>> @@ -632,10 +632,31 @@ static inline void check_seg_range(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>> *sbi, unsigned int segno)
>>      f2fs_bug_on(sbi, segno > TOTAL_SEGS(sbi) - 1);
>>  }
>>
>> -static inline void verify_block_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t 
>> blk_addr)
>> -{
>> -    BUG_ON(blk_addr < SEG0_BLKADDR(sbi)
>> -                    || blk_addr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi));
>> +static inline void verify_block_addr(struct f2fs_io_info *fio, block_t 
>> blk_addr)
>> +{
>> +    struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = fio->sbi;
>> +    enum page_type btype = PAGE_TYPE_OF_BIO(fio->type);
>> +    struct f2fs_super_block *raw_super = F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi);
>> +    block_t seg0_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment0_blkaddr);
>> +    block_t main_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->main_blkaddr);
>> +    block_t max_blkaddr = (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count)
>> +                            << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg) + seg0_blkaddr;
>
>Why not use the existing macros - MAIN_BLKADDR, SEG0_BLKADDR and MAX_BLKADDR?

Some read io during mount process will issue before segment manager init, which 
will
conduct panic.

Thanks.
>
>> +
>> +    if (is_read_io(fio->op)) {
>> +            if (btype == META && fio->is_meta)
>> +                    BUG_ON(blk_addr < seg0_blkaddr
>> +                            || blk_addr >= main_blkaddr);
>> +            else
>> +                    BUG_ON(blk_addr < main_blkaddr
>> +                            || blk_addr >= max_blkaddr);
>> +    } else {
>> +            if (btype == META)
>> +                    BUG_ON(blk_addr < seg0_blkaddr
>> +                            || blk_addr >= main_blkaddr);
>> +            else
>> +                    BUG_ON(blk_addr < main_blkaddr
>> +                            || blk_addr >= max_blkaddr);
>> +    }
>>  }
>>
>>  /*
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
>--
>--
>Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
>The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to