On 2018/3/7 11:59, Yunlei He wrote: > fix a wrong report for dump an {d,id,did}node like this: > > [print_node_info: 283] Node ID [0x6820:26656] is direct node or indirect node. > [0] [0x 16b6684 : 23815812] > [1] [0x 16b6685 : 23815813] > [2] [0x 16b6686 : 23815814] > [3] [0x 16b6687 : 23815815] > [4] [0x 16b6688 : 23815816] > [5] [0x 16b6689 : 23815817] > [6] [0x 16b668a : 23815818] > [7] [0x 16b668b : 23815819] > [8] [0x 16b668c : 23815820] > [9] [0x 16b668d : 23815821] > [10] [0x 16b668e : 23815822] > Invalid (i)node block > > Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel