On 2018/3/7 11:59, Yunlei He wrote:
> fix a wrong report for dump an {d,id,did}node like this:
>
> [print_node_info: 283] Node ID [0x6820:26656] is direct node or indirect node.
> [0] [0x 16b6684 : 23815812]
> [1] [0x 16b6685 : 23815813]
> [2] [0x 16b6686 : 23815814]
> [3] [0x 16b6687 : 23815815]
> [4] [0x 16b6688 : 23815816]
> [5] [0x 16b6689 : 23815817]
> [6] [0x 16b668a : 23815818]
> [7] [0x 16b668b : 23815819]
> [8] [0x 16b668c : 23815820]
> [9] [0x 16b668d : 23815821]
> [10] [0x 16b668e : 23815822]
> Invalid (i)node block
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
