On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:26:43AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 09-04-18 12:40:44, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > The problem is that the mapping gfp flags are used not only for allocating > > pages, but also for allocating the page cache data structures that hold > > the pages. F2FS is the only filesystem that set the __GFP_ZERO bit, > > so it's the first time anyone's noticed that the page cache passes the > > __GFP_ZERO bit through to the radix tree allocation routines, which > > causes the radix tree nodes to be zeroed instead of constructed. > > > > I think the right solution to this is: > > This just hides the underlying problem that the node is not fully and > properly initialized. Relying on the previous released state is just too > subtle.
That's the fundamental design of slab-with-constructors. The user provides a constructor, so all newly allocagted objects are initialised to a known state, then the user will restore the object to that state when it frees the object to slab. > Are you going to blacklist all potential gfp flags that come > from the mapping? This is just unmaintainable! If anything this should > be an explicit & with the allowed set of allowed flags. Oh, I agree that using the set of flags used to allocate the page in order to allocate the radix tree nodes is a pretty horrible idea. Your suggestion, then, is: - error = radix_tree_preload(gfp_mask & ~__GFP_HIGHMEM); + error = radix_tree_preload(gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK); correct? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
