On 06/21, Chao Yu wrote:
> If there is millions of discard entries cached in rb tree, each
> sanity check of it can cause very long latency as held cmd_lock
> blocking other lock grabbers.
> 
> In other aspect, we have enabled the check very long time, as
> we see, there is no such inconsistent condition caused by bugs.
> 
> But still we do not choose to kill it directly, instead, adding
> an flag to disable the check now, if there is related code change,
> we can reuse it to detect bugs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyun...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  1 +
>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 10 +++++++---
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 49c687173923..412e907920c2 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ struct discard_cmd_control {
>       atomic_t issing_discard;                /* # of issing discard */
>       atomic_t discard_cmd_cnt;               /* # of cached cmd count */
>       struct rb_root root;                    /* root of discard rb-tree */
> +     bool rbtree_check;                      /* config for consistence check 
> */
>  };
>  
>  /* for the list of fsync inodes, used only during recovery */
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 6dbdf2c48fba..8c1d6c546fa0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1199,8 +1199,9 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>               mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>               if (list_empty(pend_list))
>                       goto next;
> -             f2fs_bug_on(sbi,
> -                     !f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
> +             if (dcc->rbtree_check)

                unlikely()?

> +                     f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi,
> +                                                             &dcc->root));
>               blk_start_plug(&plug);
>               list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, tmp, pend_list, list) {
>                       f2fs_bug_on(sbi, dc->state != D_PREP);
> @@ -1752,6 +1753,7 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct 
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>       dcc->max_discards = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg;
>       dcc->undiscard_blks = 0;
>       dcc->root = RB_ROOT;
> +     dcc->rbtree_check = false;
>  
>       init_waitqueue_head(&dcc->discard_wait_queue);
>       SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info = dcc;
> @@ -2381,7 +2383,9 @@ static void __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct 
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>       issued = 0;
>  
>       mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> -     f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi, &dcc->root));
> +     if (dcc->rbtree_check)

                unlikely()?

> +             f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !f2fs_check_rb_tree_consistence(sbi,
> +                                                             &dcc->root));
>  
>       dc = (struct discard_cmd *)f2fs_lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
>                                       NULL, start,
> -- 
> 2.18.0.rc1

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to