On 2018/7/23 20:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 07/15, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/7/15 11:13, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 07/15, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/7/15 9:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> On 07/08, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>> From: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some devices has small max_{hw,}discard_sectors, so that in
>>>>>> __blkdev_issue_discard(), one big size discard bio can be split
>>>>>> into multiple small size discard bios, result in heavy load in IO
>>>>>> scheduler and device, which can hang other sync IO for long time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, f2fs is trying to control discard commands more elaboratively,
>>>>>> in order to make less conflict in between discard IO and user IO
>>>>>> to enhance application's performance, so in this patch, we will
>>>>>> split discard bio in f2fs in prior to in block layer to reduce
>>>>>> issuing multiple discard bios in a short time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we just change __submit_discard_cmd() to submit the large candidate
>>>>> partially and adjust lstart in the original candidate?
>>>>
>>>> Yep, could you check __submit_discard_cmd() implementation below? Does that
>>>> match the thoughts from you?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>> - change to split discard command entry before submission.
>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  13 +++---
>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 117 
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>>>>  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>>> index c48b655d5d8d..359526d88d3f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>>> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ enum {
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  #define MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS(sbi)         BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)
>>>>>>  #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST         8       /* issue 8 discards per 
>>>>>> round */
>>>>>> -#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN             512     /* Max. 2MB per discard 
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>  #define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME      50      /* 50 ms, if exists */
>>>>>>  #define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME      500     /* 500 ms, if device 
>>>>>> busy */
>>>>>>  #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME      60000   /* 60 s, if no 
>>>>>> candidates */
>>>>>> @@ -709,22 +708,22 @@ static inline void set_extent_info(struct 
>>>>>> extent_info *ei, unsigned int fofs,
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static inline bool __is_discard_mergeable(struct discard_info *back,
>>>>>> -                                                struct discard_info 
>>>>>> *front)
>>>>>> +                        struct discard_info *front, unsigned int 
>>>>>> max_len)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>          return (back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart) &&
>>>>>> -                (back->len + front->len < DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN);
>>>>>> +                (back->len + front->len <= max_len);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static inline bool __is_discard_back_mergeable(struct discard_info *cur,
>>>>>> -                                                struct discard_info 
>>>>>> *back)
>>>>>> +                        struct discard_info *back, unsigned int max_len)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>> -        return __is_discard_mergeable(back, cur);
>>>>>> +        return __is_discard_mergeable(back, cur, max_len);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static inline bool __is_discard_front_mergeable(struct discard_info 
>>>>>> *cur,
>>>>>> -                                                struct discard_info 
>>>>>> *front)
>>>>>> +                        struct discard_info *front, unsigned int 
>>>>>> max_len)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>> -        return __is_discard_mergeable(cur, front);
>>>>>> +        return __is_discard_mergeable(cur, front, max_len);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static inline bool __is_extent_mergeable(struct extent_info *back,
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>>> index f7f56dd091b4..cbf8f3f9a8e7 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>>> @@ -966,17 +966,24 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct 
>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -
>>>
>>> ===================== BEGIN
>>>
>>>>>> +static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>> +                                struct block_device *bdev, block_t 
>>>>>> lstart,
>>>>>> +                                block_t start, block_t len);
>>>>>>  /* this function is copied from blkdev_issue_discard from 
>>>>>> block/blk-lib.c */
>>>>>>  static void __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>                                                  struct discard_policy 
>>>>>> *dpolicy,
>>>>>> -                                                struct discard_cmd *dc)
>>>>>> +                                                struct discard_cmd *dc,
>>>>>> +                                                unsigned int *issued)
>>>>>>  {
>>>>>> +        struct block_device *bdev = dc->bdev;
>>>>>> +        struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>>>>>> +        unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
>>>>>> +                        SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>>>>>>          struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
>>>>>>          struct list_head *wait_list = (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) 
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>                                          &(dcc->fstrim_list) : 
>>>>>> &(dcc->wait_list);
>>>>>> -        struct bio *bio = NULL;
>>>>>>          int flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
>>>>>> +        block_t lstart, start, len, total_len;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>          if (dc->state != D_PREP)
>>>>>>                  return;
>>>>>> @@ -984,30 +991,63 @@ static void __submit_discard_cmd(struct 
>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>          if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK))
>>>>>>                  return;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -        trace_f2fs_issue_discard(dc->bdev, dc->start, dc->len);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -        dc->error = __blkdev_issue_discard(dc->bdev,
>>>>>> -                                SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(dc->start),
>>>>>> -                                SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(dc->len),
>>>>>> -                                GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
>>>>>> -        if (!dc->error) {
>>>>>> -                /* should keep before submission to avoid D_DONE right 
>>>>>> away */
>>>>>> -                dc->state = D_SUBMIT;
>>>>>> -                atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
>>>>>> -                atomic_inc(&dcc->issing_discard);
>>>>>> -                if (bio) {
>>>>>> -                        bio->bi_private = dc;
>>>>>> -                        bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
>>>>>> -                        bio->bi_opf |= flag;
>>>>>> -                        submit_bio(bio);
>>>>>> -                        list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
>>>>>> -                        __check_sit_bitmap(sbi, dc->start, dc->start + 
>>>>>> dc->len);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -                        f2fs_update_iostat(sbi, FS_DISCARD, 1);
>>>>>> +        trace_f2fs_issue_discard(bdev, dc->start, dc->len);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        lstart = dc->lstart;
>>>>>> +        start = dc->start;
>>>>>> +        len = dc->len;
>>>>>> +        total_len = len;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        while (total_len && *issued < dpolicy->max_requests) {
>>>>>> +                struct bio *bio = NULL;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +                if (len > max_discard_blocks)
>>>>>> +                        len = max_discard_blocks;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +                dc->error = __blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
>>>>>> +                                        SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(start),
>>>>>> +                                        SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len),
>>>>>> +                                        GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
>>>>>> +                if (!dc->error) {
>>>>>> +                        /*
>>>>>> +                         * should keep before submission to avoid D_DONE
>>>>>> +                         * right away
>>>>>> +                         */
>>>>>> +                        dc->state = D_SUBMIT;
>>>>>> +                        dc->len = len;
>>>>>> +                        atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
>>>>>> +                        atomic_inc(&dcc->issing_discard);
>>>>>> +                        if (bio) {
>>>>>> +                                bio->bi_private = dc;
>>>>>> +                                bio->bi_end_io = 
>>>>>> f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
>>>>>> +                                bio->bi_opf |= flag;
>>>>>> +                                submit_bio(bio);
>>>>>> +                                list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
>>>>>> +                                __check_sit_bitmap(sbi, dc->start,
>>>>>> +                                                        dc->start + 
>>>>>> dc->len);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +                                f2fs_update_iostat(sbi, FS_DISCARD, 1);
>>>>>> +                        }
>>>>>> +                } else {
>>>>>> +                        __remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
>>>
>>> Keep the original one, since it's partially failed?
>>
>> During __submit_discard_cmd(), we are trying to split original dc into 
>> multiple
>> dc, and once we failed to submit some of them, we will remove corresponding 
>> dc,
>> the removal logic is the same as before, not being changed...
>>
>> If we want to keep failed dc and do retry, we'd better add another patch for
>> that, right?
> 
> I thought removing failed portion of the dc.
> 
>>
>>>
>>>>>> +                        return;
>>>>>> +                }
>>>>>> +                lstart += len;
>>>>>> +                start += len;
>>>>>> +                total_len -= len;
>>>>>> +                len = total_len;
>>>>>> +                (*issued)++;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +                if (len) {
>>>>>> +                        __update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart,
>>>>>> +                                                                start, 
>>>>>> len);
>>>
>>> Do we really need this? We already grabbed one candidate which was not 
>>> merged
>>> well.
>>
>> You mean submitting multiple bios based on one large size dc?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>>
>> Previously, one bio references to one dc as below, in end_io, it will change
>> dc->state which can be detected by its own waiter.
>>
>>      bio->bi_private = dc;
>>      bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
>>      bio->bi_opf |= flag;
>>
>> If multiple bios reference to one dc, it will be more complicated to handle
>> that. How do you think?
> 
> I was concerned about too many entries in the lists. How about adding a refcnt
> to count how many bios were issued on the dc?

Got you, let me try to refactor a bit for that.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>>> +                        dc = (struct discard_cmd *)f2fs_lookup_rb_tree(
>>>>>> +                                                &dcc->root, NULL, 
>>>>>> lstart);
>>>>>> +                        f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !dc);
>>>>>>                  }
>>>>>> -        } else {
>>>>>> -                __remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +        return;
>>>>>>  }
>>>
>>> ======================= END
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static struct discard_cmd *__insert_discard_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>>>>>> *sbi,
>>>>>> @@ -1088,10 +1128,11 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>          struct discard_cmd *dc;
>>>>>>          struct discard_info di = {0};
>>>>>>          struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
>>>>>> +        struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>>>>>> +        unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
>>>>>> +                        SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
>>>>>>          block_t end = lstart + len;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -        mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>          dc = (struct discard_cmd *)f2fs_lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
>>>>>>                                          NULL, lstart,
>>>>>>                                          (struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
>>>>>> @@ -1131,7 +1172,8 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>                  if (prev_dc && prev_dc->state == D_PREP &&
>>>>>>                          prev_dc->bdev == bdev &&
>>>>>> -                        __is_discard_back_mergeable(&di, &prev_dc->di)) 
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> +                        __is_discard_back_mergeable(&di, &prev_dc->di,
>>>>>> +                                                        
>>>>>> max_discard_blocks)) {
>>>>>>                          prev_dc->di.len += di.len;
>>>>>>                          dcc->undiscard_blks += di.len;
>>>>>>                          __relocate_discard_cmd(dcc, prev_dc);
>>>>>> @@ -1142,7 +1184,8 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>                  if (next_dc && next_dc->state == D_PREP &&
>>>>>>                          next_dc->bdev == bdev &&
>>>>>> -                        __is_discard_front_mergeable(&di, 
>>>>>> &next_dc->di)) {
>>>>>> +                        __is_discard_front_mergeable(&di, &next_dc->di,
>>>>>> +                                                        
>>>>>> max_discard_blocks)) {
>>>>>>                          next_dc->di.lstart = di.lstart;
>>>>>>                          next_dc->di.len += di.len;
>>>>>>                          next_dc->di.start = di.start;
>>>>>> @@ -1165,8 +1208,6 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>                  node = rb_next(&prev_dc->rb_node);
>>>>>>                  next_dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, 
>>>>>> rb_node);
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -        mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>> @@ -1181,7 +1222,9 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>>>>>> *sbi,
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>                  blkstart -= FDEV(devi).start_blk;
>>>>>>          }
>>>>>> +        mutex_lock(&SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->cmd_lock);
>>>>>>          __update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lblkstart, blkstart, 
>>>>>> blklen);
>>>>>> +        mutex_unlock(&SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->cmd_lock);
>>>>>>          return 0;
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> @@ -1220,9 +1263,9 @@ static unsigned int 
>>>>>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>                  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>                  dcc->next_pos = dc->lstart + dc->len;
>>>>>> -                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
>>>>>> +                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -                if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>>>>>> +                if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>>>>>>                          break;
>>>>>>  next:
>>>>>>                  node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
>>>>>> @@ -1277,9 +1320,9 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info 
>>>>>> *sbi,
>>>>>>                                  break;
>>>>>>                          }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -                        __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
>>>>>> +                        __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -                        if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>>>>>> +                        if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
>>>>>>                                  break;
>>>>>>                  }
>>>>>>                  blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>>>>>> @@ -2475,9 +2518,9 @@ static unsigned int 
>>>>>> __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>                          goto skip;
>>>>>>                  }
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
>>>>>> +                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -                if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
>>>>>> +                if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
>>>>>>                          start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>                          blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> 2.16.2.17.g38e79b1fd
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to