Hi Sheng,
On 2018/8/1 11:46, Sheng Yong wrote:
> Fixes: 652d19558a347 ('f2fs: fix to do sanity check with block address in
> main area')
> Reported-by: Zhang Xiaobo <tony.zhangxia...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyo...@huawei.com>
That's my bad, and thanks for the fix.
Do you mind merge this into buggy patch, since the patch has not been upstreamed
yet.
Thanks,
> ---
> fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 3587aa53dc90..c32ee10a1384 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ static struct page *validate_checkpoint(struct
> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> goto invalid_cp1;
>
> if (le32_to_cpu(cp_block->cp_pack_total_block_count) >
> - sbi->log_blocks_per_seg) {
> + sbi->blocks_per_seg - 1) {
> f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
> "invalid cp_pack_total_block_count:%u",
> le32_to_cpu(cp_block->cp_pack_total_block_count));
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
