On 2018/9/20 7:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 09/19, Junling Zheng wrote: >> From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> >> >> If sb checksum is not enabled, and cp pack is valid due to no >> crc inconsistence, let's try to recover cp_payload based on >> cp_pack_start_sum in cp pack. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> >> --- >> fsck/f2fs.h | 5 +++++ >> fsck/mount.c | 10 +++++++--- >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fsck/f2fs.h b/fsck/f2fs.h >> index d216444..0d0d5e2 100644 >> --- a/fsck/f2fs.h >> +++ b/fsck/f2fs.h >> @@ -259,6 +259,11 @@ static inline unsigned long __bitmap_size(struct >> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int flag) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static inline block_t __cp_payload(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) >> +{ >> + return le32_to_cpu(F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi)->cp_payload); >> +} >> + >> static inline void *__bitmap_ptr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int flag) >> { >> struct f2fs_checkpoint *ckpt = F2FS_CKPT(sbi); >> diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c >> index 9019921..0e8fa41 100644 >> --- a/fsck/mount.c >> +++ b/fsck/mount.c >> @@ -975,12 +975,16 @@ int sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) >> } >> >> cp_pack_start_sum = __start_sum_addr(sbi); >> - cp_payload = get_sb(cp_payload); >> + cp_payload = __cp_payload(sbi); >> if (cp_pack_start_sum < cp_payload + 1 || >> cp_pack_start_sum > blocks_per_seg - 1 - >> NR_CURSEG_TYPE) { >> - MSG(0, "\tWrong cp_pack_start_sum(%u)\n", cp_pack_start_sum); >> - return 1; >> + MSG(0, "\tWrong cp_pack_start_sum(%u) or cp_payload(%u)\n", >> + cp_pack_start_sum, cp_payload); >> + if ((get_sb(feature) & F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)) >> + return 1; > > Is this trying to fix superblock? Why is it related to SB_CHKSUM? >
If sb_checksum is enabled, we should not try to fix superblock. In this situation, both sb and cp are verified with crc, so we don't know which one, cp_payload or cp_pack_start_sum, is the exact one. By contraries, if sb_checksum is disabled, we could try to fix superblock as below :) >> + set_sb(cp_payload, cp_pack_start_sum - 1); >> + update_superblock(sb, SB_ALL); >> } >> >> return 0; >> -- >> 2.19.0 > > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel