On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:39:13AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
>
> ->lookup() in an encrypted directory begins as follows:
>
> 1. fscrypt_prepare_lookup():
> a. Try to load the directory's encryption key.
> b. If the key is unavailable, mark the dentry as a ciphertext name
> via d_flags.
> 2. fscrypt_setup_filename():
> a. Try to load the directory's encryption key.
> b. If the key is available, encrypt the name (treated as a plaintext
> name) to get the on-disk name. Otherwise decode the name
> (treated as a ciphertext name) to get the on-disk name.
>
> But if the key is concurrently added, it may be found at (2a) but not at
> (1a). In this case, the dentry will be wrongly marked as a ciphertext
> name even though it was actually treated as plaintext.
>
> This will cause the dentry to be wrongly invalidated on the next lookup,
> potentially causing problems. For example, if the racy ->lookup() was
> part of sys_mount(), then the new mount will be detached when anything
> tries to access it. This is despite the mountpoint having a plaintext
> path, which should remain valid now that the key was added.
>
> Of course, this is only possible if there's a userspace race. Still,
> the additional kernel-side race is confusing and unexpected.
>
> Close the kernel-side race by changing fscrypt_prepare_lookup() to also
> set the on-disk filename (step 2b), consistent with the d_flags update.
>
> Fixes: 28b4c263961c ("ext4 crypto: revalidate dentry after adding or removing
> the key")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Looks good, applied.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
