On 2019-4-24 17:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/15, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Previously, f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(, blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC) will check
>> whether @blkaddr locates in main area or not.
>>
>> That check is weak, since the block address in range of main area can
>> point to the address which is not valid in segment info table, and we
>> can not detect such condition, we may suffer worse corruption as system
>> continues running.
>>
>> So this patch introduce DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE to enhance the sanity check
>> which trigger SIT bitmap check rather than only range check.
>>
>> This patch did below changes as wel:
>> - set SBI_NEED_FSCK in f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr().
>> - get rid of is_valid_data_blkaddr() to avoid panic if blkaddr is invalid.
>> - introduce verify_fio_blkaddr() to wrap fio {new,old}_blkaddr validation 
>> check.
>> - spread blkaddr check in:
>>  * f2fs_get_node_info()
>>  * __read_out_blkaddrs()
>>  * f2fs_submit_page_read()
>>  * ra_data_block()
>>  * do_recover_data()
>>
>> This patch can fix bug reported from bugzilla below:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203215
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203223
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203231
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203235
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203241
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> This introduces failures on xfstests/generic/446, and I'm testing the below
> patch on top of this. Could you check this patch, so that I could combine
> both of them?
> 
> From 8c1808c1743ad75d1ad8d1dc5a53910edaf7afd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:21:07 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: consider data race on read and truncation on
>  DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE
> 
> DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE enhanced to validate block addresses on read/write paths.
> But, xfstest/generic/446 compalins some generated kernel messages saying 
> invalid
> bitmap was detected when reading a block. The reaons is, when we get the
> block addresses from extent_cache, there is no lock to synchronize it from
> truncating the blocks in parallel.
> 
> This patch tries to return EFAULT without warning and setting SBI_NEED_FSCK
> in this case.
> 
> Fixes: ("f2fs: introduce DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE")
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  fs/f2fs/data.c       | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  6 ++++++
>  fs/f2fs/gc.c         |  9 ++++++---
>  4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index e37fbbf843a5..805a33088e82 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -130,26 +130,28 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_tmp_page(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> *sbi, pgoff_t index)
>       return __get_meta_page(sbi, index, false);
>  }
>  
> -static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr)
> +static bool __is_bitmap_valid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr,
> +                                                     int type)
>  {
>       struct seg_entry *se;
>       unsigned int segno, offset;
>       bool exist;
>  
> +     if (type != DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE && type != DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)
> +             return true;
> +
>       segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkaddr);
>       offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
>       se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
>  
>       exist = f2fs_test_bit(offset, se->cur_valid_map);
> -
> -     if (!exist) {
> +     if (!exist && type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) {
>               f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR, "Inconsistent error "
>                       "blkaddr:%u, sit bitmap:%d", blkaddr, exist);
>               set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>               WARN_ON(1);
> -             return false;
>       }
> -     return true;
> +     return exist;
>  }
>  
>  bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> @@ -173,23 +175,22 @@ bool f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>                       return false;
>               break;
>       case META_POR:
> +             if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> +                     blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)))
> +                     return false;
> +             break;
>       case DATA_GENERIC:
>       case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE:
> +     case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ:
>               if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> -                     blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) {
> -                     if (type == DATA_GENERIC ||
> -                             type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) {
> -                             f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
> -                                     "access invalid blkaddr:%u", blkaddr);
> -                             set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> -                             WARN_ON(1);
> -                     }
> +                             blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi))) {
> +                     f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_WARNING,
> +                             "access invalid blkaddr:%u", blkaddr);
> +                     set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> +                     WARN_ON(1);
>                       return false;
>               } else {
> -                     if (type == DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE) {
> -                             if (!__is_bitmap_valid(sbi, blkaddr))
> -                                     return false;
> -                     }
> +                     return __is_bitmap_valid(sbi, blkaddr, type);
>               }
>               break;
>       case META_GENERIC:
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 34d248ac9e0f..d32a82f25f5a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -564,9 +564,6 @@ static struct bio *f2fs_grab_read_bio(struct inode 
> *inode, block_t blkaddr,
>       struct bio_post_read_ctx *ctx;
>       unsigned int post_read_steps = 0;
>  
> -     if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))
> -             return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> -
>       bio = f2fs_bio_alloc(sbi, min_t(int, nr_pages, BIO_MAX_PAGES), false);
>       if (!bio)
>               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> @@ -597,9 +594,6 @@ static int f2fs_submit_page_read(struct inode *inode, 
> struct page *page,
>       struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
>       struct bio *bio;
>  
> -     if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))
> -             return -EFAULT;
> -
>       bio = f2fs_grab_read_bio(inode, blkaddr, 1, 0);
>       if (IS_ERR(bio))
>               return PTR_ERR(bio);
> @@ -741,6 +735,11 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_read_data_page(struct inode 
> *inode, pgoff_t index,
>  
>       if (f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(inode, index, &ei)) {
>               dn.data_blkaddr = ei.blk + index - ei.fofs;
> +             if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode), dn.data_blkaddr,
> +                                             DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {

If I'm not missing anything, we just need use DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ to cover
below two paths:
- gc_data_segment -> f2fs_get_read_data_page
- move_data_page -> f2fs_get_lock_data_page -> f2fs_get_read_data_page

Other paths which calls f2fs_get_read_data_page is safe to verify blkaddr with
DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE?

> +                     err = -EFAULT;
> +                     goto put_err;
> +             }
>               goto got_it;
>       }
>  
> @@ -754,6 +753,13 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_read_data_page(struct inode 
> *inode, pgoff_t index,
>               err = -ENOENT;
>               goto put_err;
>       }
> +     if (dn.data_blkaddr != NEW_ADDR &&
> +                     !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> +                                             dn.data_blkaddr,
> +                                             DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> +             err = -EFAULT;
> +             goto put_err;
> +     }
>  got_it:
>       if (PageUptodate(page)) {
>               unlock_page(page);
> @@ -1566,7 +1572,7 @@ static int f2fs_read_single_page(struct inode *inode, 
> struct page *page,
>               }
>  
>               if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode), block_nr,
> -                                                     DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> +                                             DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {
>                       ret = -EFAULT;
>                       goto out;
>               }
> @@ -2528,6 +2534,11 @@ static int f2fs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct 
> address_space *mapping,
>               zero_user_segment(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
>               SetPageUptodate(page);
>       } else {
> +             if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, blkaddr,
> +                             DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {

Need DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE because write() is exclusive with truncate() due to
inode_lock()?

Thanks,

> +                     err = -EFAULT;
> +                     goto fail;
> +             }
>               err = f2fs_submit_page_read(inode, page, blkaddr);
>               if (err)
>                       goto fail;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index f5ffc09705eb..533fafca68f4 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -212,6 +212,12 @@ enum {
>       META_POR,
>       DATA_GENERIC,           /* check range only */
>       DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE,   /* strong check on range and segment bitmap */
> +     DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ,      /*
> +                                      * strong check on range and segment
> +                                      * bitmap but no warning due to race
> +                                      * condition of read on truncated area
> +                                      * by extent_cache
> +                                      */
>       META_GENERIC,
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index 3a097949b5d4..963fb4571fd9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -656,6 +656,11 @@ static int ra_data_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t 
> index)
>  
>       if (f2fs_lookup_extent_cache(inode, index, &ei)) {
>               dn.data_blkaddr = ei.blk + index - ei.fofs;
> +             if (unlikely(!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dn.data_blkaddr,
> +                                             DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ))) {
> +                     err = -EFAULT;
> +                     goto put_page;
> +             }
>               goto got_it;
>       }
>  
> @@ -669,14 +674,12 @@ static int ra_data_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t 
> index)
>               err = -ENOENT;
>               goto put_page;
>       }
> -
> -got_it:
>       if (unlikely(!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, dn.data_blkaddr,
>                                               DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE))) {
>               err = -EFAULT;
>               goto put_page;
>       }
> -
> +got_it:
>       /* read page */
>       fio.page = page;
>       fio.new_blkaddr = fio.old_blkaddr = dn.data_blkaddr;
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to