On 06/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> One more concern is that, if checkpoint A is corrupted, and checkpoint B is
> valid, we may copy CP B to CP A, and then writeback fixed CP B with the same
> cp_ver, then kernel will load CP A if two CP has the same cp_ver, result in
> loading wrong CP, right?

Yup, we need to handle that. When copying the checkpoint, we may need to copy
whole segment w/ version - 1.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> On 2019-6-24 10:24, Chao Yu wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > 
> > I picked up Weichao's patch since I'm not sure whether Weichao still has 
> > time
> > working on it.
> > 
> > On 2019/6/24 9:23, guo weichao wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> I think it's better to copy CP A to CP B position first, which can make 
> >> sure we
> >> have a fsck-not-touched correct checkpoint. 
> > 
> > Jaegeuk, Weichao,
> > 
> > I think it's okay, let me update the patch. :)
> > 
> >>
> >> P.S: did you want to discuss it with Chao Yu? :)HAHA
> > 
> > Weichao, it's glad to see your activity again. ;)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Weichao
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> *发件人:* Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> >> *发送时间:* 2019年6月23日 5:46
> >> *收件人:* Chao Yu
> >> *抄送:* [email protected]
> >> *主题:* Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: write checkpoint with OPU mode
> >>  
> >> Hi Weichao,
> >>
> >> This patch breaks the image found by my local power-cut tests.
> >>
> >> On 05/24, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> This original patch was from Weichao Guo.
> >>>
> >>> We may encounter both checkpoints invalid in such a case:
> >>> 1. kernel writes CP A;
> >>> 2. power-cut when kernel writes CP B, then CP B is corrupted;
> >>> 3. fsck: load CP A, fix meta/data;
> >>
> >> Would it be better to copy CP A to CP B position first?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>> 4. power-cut when fsck writes CP A in-place, then CP A is corrupted too;
> >>>
> >>> To avoid both checkpoints being invalid, this patch changes to enables
> >>> fsck to write checkpoint with out-place-update method first, and then
> >>> write checkpoint in original place.
> >>>
> >>> This can make sure during fsck repairing, even there is sudden power-cut,
> >>> filesystem will still have at least one valid checkpoint.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Weichao Guo <[email protected]>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
> >>> ---
> >>> v2:
> >>> - clean up codes
> >>> - cover flush_journal_entries() case
> >>> - update commet message
> >>>   fsck/fsck.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> >>>   fsck/fsck.h  |  1 +
> >>>   fsck/mount.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >>>   3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
> >>> index 6f0f262..6aed51d 100644
> >>> --- a/fsck/fsck.c
> >>> +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
> >>> @@ -2121,6 +2121,19 @@ static void fix_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >>> *sbi)
> >>>                 write_nat_bits(sbi, sb, cp, sbi->cur_cp);
> >>>   }
> >>>   
> >>> +static void fix_checkpoints(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     int i, ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> >>> +             /* write checkpoint out of place first */
> >>> +             sbi->cur_cp = sbi->cur_cp % 2 + 1;
> >>> +             fix_checkpoint(sbi);
> >>> +             ret = f2fs_fsync_device();
> >>> +             ASSERT(ret >= 0);
> >>> +     }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>   int check_curseg_offset(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> >>>   {
> >>>         struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
> >>> @@ -2771,10 +2784,10 @@ int fsck_verify(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>                         rewrite_sit_area_bitmap(sbi);
> >>>                         fix_curseg_info(sbi);
> >>>                         fix_checksum(sbi);
> >>> -                     fix_checkpoint(sbi);
> >>> +                     fix_checkpoints(sbi);
> >>>                 } else if (is_set_ckpt_flags(cp, CP_FSCK_FLAG) ||
> >>>                         is_set_ckpt_flags(cp, CP_QUOTA_NEED_FSCK_FLAG)) {
> >>> -                     write_checkpoint(sbi);
> >>> +                     write_checkpoints(sbi);
> >>>                 }
> >>>         }
> >>>         return ret;
> >>> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.h b/fsck/fsck.h
> >>> index d38e8de..8fe5db1 100644
> >>> --- a/fsck/fsck.h
> >>> +++ b/fsck/fsck.h
> >>> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ extern void move_curseg_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *, 
> >>> u64, int);
> >>>   extern void write_curseg_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> >>>   extern int find_next_free_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *, u64 *, int, int);
> >>>   extern void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> >>> +extern void write_checkpoints(struct f2fs_sb_info *);
> >>>   extern void update_superblock(struct f2fs_super_block *, int);
> >>>   extern void update_data_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t, u16, 
> >>> block_t);
> >>>   extern void update_nat_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *, nid_t, nid_t, 
> >>> block_t);
> >>> diff --git a/fsck/mount.c b/fsck/mount.c
> >>> index 1c5cd93..bbb1af7 100644
> >>> --- a/fsck/mount.c
> >>> +++ b/fsck/mount.c
> >>> @@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ void flush_journal_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>         int n_sits = flush_sit_journal_entries(sbi);
> >>>   
> >>>         if (n_nats || n_sits)
> >>> -             write_checkpoint(sbi);
> >>> +             write_checkpoints(sbi);
> >>>   }
> >>>   
> >>>   void flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>> @@ -2452,6 +2452,19 @@ void write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>         ASSERT(ret >= 0);
> >>>   }
> >>>   
> >>> +void write_checkpoints(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>> +{
> >>> +     int i, ret;
> >>> +
> >>> +     for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> >>> +             /* write checkpoint out of place first */
> >>> +             sbi->cur_cp = sbi->cur_cp % 2 + 1;
> >>> +             write_checkpoint(sbi);
> >>> +             ret = f2fs_fsync_device();
> >>> +             ASSERT(ret >= 0);
> >>> +     }
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>>   void build_nat_area_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>   {
> >>>         struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
> >>> -- 
> >>> 2.18.0.rc1
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to