On 08/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> It tries to let fsck be noticed wrong inline size, and do the fix.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> ---
> fsck/fsck.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fsck/fsck.c b/fsck/fsck.c
> index d53317c..7eb599d 100644
> --- a/fsck/fsck.c
> +++ b/fsck/fsck.c
> @@ -771,6 +771,8 @@ void fsck_chk_inode_blk(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32 nid,
> ofs = get_extra_isize(node_blk);
>
> if ((node_blk->i.i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_DATA)) {
> + unsigned int inline_size = MAX_INLINE_DATA(node_blk);
> +
> if (le32_to_cpu(node_blk->i.i_addr[ofs]) != 0) {
> /* should fix this bug all the time */
> FIX_MSG("inline_data has wrong 0'th block = %x",
> @@ -779,6 +781,12 @@ void fsck_chk_inode_blk(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, u32
> nid,
> node_blk->i.i_blocks = cpu_to_le64(*blk_cnt);
> need_fix = 1;
> }
> + if (!i_size || i_size > inline_size) {
i_size=0 should be fine?
> + node_blk->i.i_size = cpu_to_le64(inline_size);
> + FIX_MSG("inline_data has wrong i_size %lu",
> + (unsigned long)i_size);
> + need_fix = 1;
> + }
> if (!(node_blk->i.i_inline & F2FS_DATA_EXIST)) {
> char buf[MAX_INLINE_DATA(node_blk)];
> memset(buf, 0, MAX_INLINE_DATA(node_blk));
> --
> 2.18.0.rc1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
