On 2019/8/16 6:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/12, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019/8/9 23:12, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> We actually don't need to issue trim on entire disk by checking first
>>> blocks having zeros.
>>
>> In heap mode, we locate node log header to tail end of device, should we
>> consider to check block contain according to heap option?
> 
> I wanted to check F2FS metadata mainly.

Oh, I thought you mean main area. :P

> 
>>
>> BTW, if we changed cp_ver whenever mkfs, why should we still issue trim to
>> obsolete old data in node remained in image?
> 
> For simplicity. :P

I didn't get why we can assume all metadata are zeroed if first 16MB are all 
zero...

BTW, if first 16MB are non-zero, why not just trim F2FS metadata rather than
whole area?

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> v2 from v1:
>>>  - clean up
>>>
>>>  mkfs/f2fs_format_utils.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mkfs/f2fs_format_utils.c b/mkfs/f2fs_format_utils.c
>>> index 8bf128c..f2d55ad 100644
>>> --- a/mkfs/f2fs_format_utils.c
>>> +++ b/mkfs/f2fs_format_utils.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>>  #include <stdio.h>
>>>  #include <unistd.h>
>>>  #include <stdlib.h>
>>> +#include <stdbool.h>
>>>  #ifndef ANDROID_WINDOWS_HOST
>>>  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>>>  #endif
>>> @@ -110,13 +111,61 @@ static int trim_device(int i)
>>>     return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static bool is_wiped_device(int i)
>>> +{
>>> +#ifdef WITH_ANDROID
>>> +   struct device_info *dev = c.devices + i;
>>> +   int fd = dev->fd;
>>> +   char *buf, *zero_buf;
>>> +   bool wiped = true;
>>> +   int nblocks = 4096;     /* 16MB size */
>>> +   int j;
>>> +
>>> +   buf = malloc(F2FS_BLKSIZE);
>>> +   if (buf == NULL) {
>>> +           MSG(1, "\tError: Malloc Failed for buf!!!\n");
>>> +           return false;
>>> +   }
>>> +   zero_buf = calloc(1, F2FS_BLKSIZE);
>>> +   if (zero_buf == NULL) {
>>> +           MSG(1, "\tError: Calloc Failed for zero buf!!!\n");
>>> +           free(buf);
>>> +           return false;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   if (lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET) < 0) {
>>> +           free(zero_buf);
>>> +           free(buf);
>>> +           return false;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>> +   /* check first n blocks */
>>> +   for (j = 0; j < nblocks; j++) {
>>> +           if (read(fd, buf, F2FS_BLKSIZE) != F2FS_BLKSIZE ||
>>> +                           memcmp(buf, zero_buf, F2FS_BLKSIZE)) {
>>> +                   wiped = false;
>>> +                   break;
>>> +           }
>>> +   }
>>> +   free(zero_buf);
>>> +   free(buf);
>>> +
>>> +   if (wiped)
>>> +           MSG(0, "Info: Found all zeros in first %d blocks\n", nblocks);
>>> +   return wiped;
>>> +#else
>>> +   return false;
>>> +#endif
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  int f2fs_trim_devices(void)
>>>  {
>>>     int i;
>>>  
>>> -   for (i = 0; i < c.ndevs; i++)
>>> -           if (trim_device(i))
>>> +   for (i = 0; i < c.ndevs; i++) {
>>> +           if (!is_wiped_device(i) && trim_device(i))
>>>                     return -1;
>>> +   }
>>>     c.trimmed = 1;
>>>     return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
> .
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to